Recent post of Budd has convinced me that my chapter "MIND AND BRAIN" which deals with rather complex issues, failed to formulate them clearly enough for non-specialists. Forced to comply with the common usage, I had to use the anti-scientific term "matter", which muddled several critical points. The heading note, supposed to do the un-muddling, did only half the job.
I partially reedited "MIND AND BRAIN" and uploaded it to http://findgeorges.com/CORE/D_RATIONAL_VIEW/g_mind_and_brain.html As additional support I wrote a short chapter "PHYSICAL CONSTRUCTS" uploaded to http://findgeorges.com/CORE/D_RATIONAL_VIEW/f_physical_constructs.html Comments and critiques welcome Georges --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
