Oh, Serenity Smiles... I didn't intand to say the inversion of TIME in EMIT, but the TIME in SPACE. If I have somebody as the 100% , the SPACE is 100 and the TIME is 1/100, or 100^-1, the negative power of 100^+1.
In other studies I study about the inversions tipe TIME-EMIT, when I speake of ROMA and AMOR (that in Italian is LOVE). I know that the BITTLES had a great interest in this to overturn... but it isn't a matter whithout a clear valence. I am not able to study this about the English language since my great WORK HARD also when I simly speake... of what I do not know very well, or... of what is just enough to not say any nonsense! I beg your pardn... but I think that it is better for you to read my bad English than an automatic translation. And so I work hard. On 11 Lug, 07:39, "Serenity Smiles" <[email protected]> wrote: > If you reverse the word time you get emit, (I guess sending out the moment > now), So, what would be emitting to give time please, I am not a physicist, > but, would love to know if this could equate with physics and the > understanding of how the epistemeology arose like this. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "amoram" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 8:42 AM > To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]> > Subject: [epistemology 10687] The Romano Amodeo THEOREM, symmetrical to the > "Pitagoras Theorem". > > > > > > > The TIME is also SPACE. It is an unitary inversion of the space, so > > that the speed m s^-1 is unitary one. > > Tomano Amodeo affirms that "all the rules that exist about the SPACE, > > when are exactly inverted, exist and have worth also about the TIME". > > > Now, since our world has 4 dimension, it is ruled by the orthogonal > > system, in which for the space has worth the Pitagoras Theorem: <The > > space distance between two points of two normal space vectors starting > > from the same point is the hypotenuse of a right triangle and it is > > the squared radix of the sum of the square of the two sides equal to > > the each vector>. > > > For the Romano Amodeo’s Theorem of the inversion between space and > > time, Amodeo affirms his Pitagoras Theorem about the time: <The time > > distance between two points of two normal time vectors starting from > > the same point is the hypotenuse of a right triangle and it is the > > square of the sum of the squared radix of the two sides equal to the > > each vector>. > > This is true one because square rule and squared radix rule are truly > > opposite rules. > > > The Pitagoras Theorem is valid one because the space is scalar one, > > and consequently its truth is its square, equal to the product between > > the two opposite vectors: the “positive” and “negative” one, in the > > two opposite verses ruled by the Action and Reaction principle. > > The Romano Amodeo Theorem is valid one because the time is a vector, > > and consequently its truth is its squared radix, equal to the division > > between the two opposite energies: the “positive” and the “negative” > > one in the two opposite verses of the relative action by the Action > > and Reaction principle. > > > REAL APPLICATION OF THE R. AMODEO THEOREM, about the TIMES’S > > COMPLETION. > > > The true Energy of the year 1936 is its squared radix, equal to the > > index 44 of the power 10^44. > > It is the atomic energy 10^44 equal to 10^30 × 10^10 × 10^4 = 1 m^3 > > completely advanced (×1 m) in its atomic “reality” 10^4 = m 10^-6 > > (that is m 10^-1, in each of the 6 components +x +t +z –x –y –z) > > This energy 44 represents the complete time cycle in the unit of the > > year. > > > By other calculus, the energy 44,85668513 represents the complete time > > cycle in the unit of the day. > > > By other one the energy 44,8566853682057075 represent the complete > > time cycle in the unit of the second minute. > > > This last one is true because 2222.222222222222 [the 16 dimensions of > > 10^4 (the unitary atomic reality), 4 in m and second, as space (as of > > space, as of its time: the 10 cycle), and 12 as the atomic space that > > unitarily advance (by 10) the 2 dimensions of the transversal area of > > the time’s flow] represents in the number 2, the positive and unitary > > advancement from -1 to +1, in each decimal dimension. > > But this is a PURE ABSOLUTE CYCLE that – to be “real one” – need to be > > a division of the power 10^2222.222222222222, by 10^210.5. > > > This 10^210.5 is the IDEA resulting by 10^7 as all the advancement in > > line of 10^3 angstrom, until the 10^10 = 1 m in which it is > > contained. > > This METER, ideally is the “unitary meter of judgment”. > > Therefore 10^7 represents the “unitary movement” in line of the > > “structural volume”. > > In the 3 lines of xyz, 10^(7×3) is the power of the power, being > > 10^7^3. > > > 10^210.5 is 10^(7×3×10) × 10^5, that is the exponent of the cycle 10 > > (the unit) of the 21 unitary advancements 7+7+7 (in 3 component lines) > > summed to the only unitary and positive direction (of the Universe) in > > the 10^10 cycle (the electric and the opposite complete advancement). > > > This 10^210.5 power id the unitary IDEAL MODEL that divides > > 10^2222.222222222222, which results divided in the power > > 10^2012.122222222222 in which the exponent number years in the unit, > > months in the two sequent decimals, days in the two sequent decimals, > > prime minutes in the two sequent decimals, second minutes in the two > > sequent decimals, third minutes in the two sequent and last decimals. > > The squared radix of this exponent, but only in the 10 dimensions of > > the atomic unit numbering the unit of the second minute, is its > > unitary energy, being the second minute our unit (since it is the full > > cycle of its third minutes). > > > The calculus gets the 44.8566853682057075 containing also the “rest”, > > as the elevation of 1 unit of the last atomic numeral. > > This allows that the spare of this squared radix is > > 2012.122222222200008634... but the four 0 dimension (as the reality) > > represent the full completion of the precedent reality. > > > This calculus is much important because allows to measure the > > COMPLETION of the time, when we start from the point ZERO. > > Since APOCALICTIC VISION are joined to the completion of the 21st of > > December 2012, the just answer now is: > > “Can we neglect the Calendar of the Mayas?”- Nascondi testo citato > > - Mostra testo citato - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
