>>Not sure I fully understand the drift of the your assertions , and so I think I'll need some further clarification(s): Of primary concern here is whether the experiments & subsequent calculations are taking into account all possible forces acting upon the said action-reaction, & the calculations *are within the actual equation*. I don't believe there is any attempt to refute the "law of conservation" here, right? >> Many of us are not trained in physics, so perhaps you'll have to remeber the audience in your writing. > I say this because I too have forgotten to consider that we come from a wide spectrum of "callings." Thanks, Chreodman
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:04 AM, amoram <[email protected]> wrote: > > Romano Amodeo affirms that in the cycle of 10 dm = 1 m, the quantity > of 9 dm is all the possible movement in line made by 1 dm contained in > that meter. This movement can be shown as a vector 9 going in a way > and as the opposite vector 9^-1 going in the opposite way. > Therefore: > <——————— ———————> > This is the representation of the sum 9 + 9^-1, which is equal to > 9,111111111. > > Therefore: > <——————— ———————> > 9 + 0,111111111. > > This is the unitary shape of the principle of ACTION and REACTION. > > But we, in our world, by one perceive the opposite one alone! > > <——————— is perceived by the opposite vector ———————>, which is in > ACTION, but in an invisible way. > > In this way, in 9,111111111 -0.001721357 = 9,109389754 (at the > dimension 10^-31 kg, that unitary one of the particle), the decimal > part (which seems become 0.109389754 by the unit 0,01721357 contained > in 0,111111111) is only the invisible and relative CAUSE IN ACTION of > that opposite, visible and relative one. > > Romano Amodeo affirms that Physics IS VERY WRONG when considers TO BE > PRESENT [as the NUMBER (a quantity more than 1) of ANY UNITARY MASS], > also the inverse part, which is submultiple of 1 and so justifies > (through this SUBMULTIPLE) that NUMBER “MULTIPLE” of the unit. > > Romano Amodeo > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
