The Topic "Different points of view" in itself is a great subject of discussion where everyone can explore his/her own potentials and knowledge about anything that exists in our Universe/country/society/village/ town/lane/home and above all within his/her own existence. Its like a nuclear chain reaction where every single atom is exited to the extent to utilize its last existence.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:47 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Today's Topic Summary > > Group: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics > > - Different points of view. <#12536a57fc870a6c_group_thread_0> [2 > Updates] > - Claude Levi-Strauss dies <#12536a57fc870a6c_group_thread_1> [1 > Update] > > Topic: Different points of > view.<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/e352b1aa9c1664fe> > > archytas <[email protected]> Nov 25 06:36PM -0800 > > I always wonder why we don't know more, if there is so much more to > know. Perhaps the information we are able to carry about is limited > and has to be for reasons beyond current thinking? What religion > becomes as a means of social control is dubious, yet before this it > may be a truly questioning experience. > > > > > > nominal9 <[email protected]> Nov 27 08:57AM -0800 > > while most schools of Tibetan > Buddhism do make a synthetic separation, call it void/not-void for > now, ... etc./ ornamentalmind > > I'm lazy, Orn, especially when it comes to the "meditative religions- > philosophies" named....can you save me some reading and give me a > notion of what is contained in the "void" or whatever else the > different views may care to call it?.... and what is the character or > the special way in which the "synthesis" interaction you speak of > takes place between the two... void .. non-void... > nominal9 > > > > > > > > Topic: Claude Levi-Strauss > dies<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/3d906bddb68a1406> > > chazwin <[email protected]> Nov 26 03:21PM -0800 > > Well Kant is vary verbose. I am told he comes across just as bad in > the original German. If you read his other stuff, he uses plain > speech. It seems that for generation when philosophers do their opus > magnum they are compelled to exclude most readers, leaving only the > anoraks. Hume does exactly the sam job as Kant but without the jargon. > But even Hume was embarrassed by his early Treatise, and wrote the > Enquiry which had more content with half the words. > > It seems to be the month of White-Wash. TOny is getting his dirty > laundry washed for free, and will come out of this enquiry looking > whiter than white, whilst the Catholic boy buggering wankers are > getting their sins removed with a wave of a cheque book. > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > -- with regards, Hem Joshi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
