Socratus has reminded us of the dualism of particles provided by quantum theory. His words: "We have one brain which works dualistically according to the Quantum theory of Dualism of particle." "... indeed an understanding of psi phenomena and of consciousness must provide the basis of an improved understanding of quantum mechanics." / Evan Walker / My view: I suggest that quantum theorists study and adopt the meridian funtion (equation) which I presented in 2003 before the Mathematical Association of Nigeria (MAN) which was also sent to International Mathematical Union IMU in New Jersy USA. I have used the equation to provide the over 300-year old much sought for geometric proof of the probability theory. Interesting, the meridian equation governs the entire globe of R variable radius, and although shows what quatun theorists describe as dualism of particles, but within the extremes are pluralities, which reflects the true nature of the universe made up of the extremities of dualism but different biases of plurarities in various dimensiions. I believe the application of the meridian equation to quantum mechanics would shed more light on the behaviour of particles and the idea of material consciousness which seems to have been in the doldrums all this while. For instance, the meridian equation would demonstrate that the brain works dualistically and also pluralistically. Socratus, what about that? Garshagu Atovigba.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:19 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Today's Topic Summary > > Group: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics > > - What is the material basis of Consciousness > ?<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=js&ver=ZZ4KpTfy1bY.en.&am=!Iec9iPCj39i5BXHC0fIucsP8-ca4xltahQvEtWFEYfFrew#1255ab3d06fb21ba_group_thread_0>[1 > Update] > - The crash of classical theory of > prob...<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=js&ver=ZZ4KpTfy1bY.en.&am=!Iec9iPCj39i5BXHC0fIucsP8-ca4xltahQvEtWFEYfFrew#1255ab3d06fb21ba_group_thread_1>[1 > Update] > - Claude Levi-Strauss > dies<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=js&ver=ZZ4KpTfy1bY.en.&am=!Iec9iPCj39i5BXHC0fIucsP8-ca4xltahQvEtWFEYfFrew#1255ab3d06fb21ba_group_thread_2>[1 > Update] > > Topic: What is the material basis of Consciousness > ?<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/3910d0ce85b31b69> > > socratus <[email protected]> Dec 04 05:06AM -0800 > > We have one brain which works dualistically > according to the Quantum theory of Dualism of particle. > == . > "... indeed an understanding of psi phenomena and of > consciousness must provide the basis of an improved > understanding of quantum mechanics." > / Evan Walker / > > > > Topic: The crash of classical theory of > prob...<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/7e12ce53e2ff1c88> > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Dec 03 01:25PM > > The crash of classical theory of prob...: > http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dwhf8fx_0gst3xrnh > > --- > We must critically look at the new theory of probability as the > classical > theory has crashed. I presented this, the geometric proof of the > probability theory, otherwise called the meridian probability theory > (or > function) in 2004 at Uinversity of Agriculture Makurdi Nigeria, before > the > National Universities Commission NUC and Prof. Gabriel Oyibo of Offapit > > University USA who was campaigning for the expungement of probability > from > the world university curriculum because he was unable to find its > geometric > proof with GAGUT. Remember that for over 300 years the search for the > geometric proof of the theory has been futile. Atovigba, GMV. > > > > Topic: Claude Levi-Strauss > dies<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/3d906bddb68a1406> > > archytas <[email protected]> Dec 03 01:19PM -0800 > > I must admit I'm amazed at what can go wrong. Windows is definitely > some kind of CIA-backed crap. It makes no sense that an OS so shit is > the market leader without some kind of interference to make this so. > No one can explain to me what advantages any systems later than XP > possess other than touchscreen in 7. I have to run 64 bit stuff for > some calculation stuff I do and some experimental voice to text. Naff > all seems compatible with this, even some bits of Office. This said, > there wouldn't be much point in me doing stuff on a MAC for eventual > use on PCs! My old Ericsson 128 running DOS would still do most of > what I need (from 1982). Hey fucking ho! > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
