No Georges, I read the wind, or perhaps had the tea-leaves examined in line with your minimalist theories, that, having disposed on any need or chance of meeting nature, clearly render clothes superfluous. The Emperor's 'child', these days, when pronouncing on nakedness, is routinely banal. How are you these days? My novel, still unfinished due to wolf from door essentials, has the character, loosely based on my vision of you, slipping out of Argentina, just before the War of Disgruntled Sheep, having ensured half the small stockpile of French flying fish cannot harm British children-at-arms gulled into the South Atlantic to create Saint Margaret. Perhaps, whilst down in the general direction, you enlarged the ozone hole over the Antarctic to ensure you and I slip cold to the grave, rather than broiled like turkeys? One Swedish child, at the alternative Copenhagen (no doubt one in an alternate universe that sweeps unseen above our heads in our living rooms?), claims we have merely wobbled rather close to the Sun, as in medieval times, and this is why the wax on our wings is melting a little. Another theory is that children themselves are responsible for global warming as carbon footprints. I think it may be Australians, the first sign being the floating up from the Antarctic to that antipodean continent, of large icebergs. We all know Australia is short of water to raise decent cricket pitches and teams on. This is the probable cause, once one understands Aussies only pretend to be permanently drunk, brash and witless. Children across the world are asked a question as part of a test of science education (the Finns come out top) in the OECD PISA study. It is a simple matter of critical reasoning, though regarded in the study as 'difficult' (itself something that should raise eyebrows on our education systems). Less than a fifth of them get it right, failing to note than proximity to and output of the 'glowing ball in the sky' has rather a lot to do with temperatures here. On 12 Dec, 08:28, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> wrote: > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: archytas <[email protected]> > > Subject: [epistemology 11051] Re: CONNED WITH THE WIND (Autant en arnaque > > le vent) > > To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]> > > Date: Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:45 PM > > I doubt it Georges. > > ================ > G: > What do you doubt? Did you read the book? > Georges. > ================ > Ecocide > > > > > seems a pretty regular feature of what > > human history I can trust. Copenhagen seems more > > likely a collision > > of ships of fools. > > > On 10 Dec, 15:14, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I have just written a book entitled: > > > CONNED WITH THE WIND > > > Obama's Climatic Hoax > > > with the motto: > > > > In 1835 the story "The Emperor's New Clothes" > > > was published in Copenhagen. > > > In December 2009 the same Copenhagen welcomes > > > the Climate-Emperor Obama dressed up in wind > > > woven clothes, swearing to choke with them > > > the Global Warming. > > > Is there still a child left who'll dare > > > to say that the Emperor is naked? > > > > Publisher Createspace > > > ISBN 1449917518 > > > > x================= > > > > Je viens d'écrire un bouquin intitulé: > > > CONNED WITH THE WIND (Autant en arnaque le vent) > > > Obama's Climatic Hoax (Canular climatique d'Obama) > > > avec la devise: > > > > En 1835 le conte "Les Habits neufs de l'Empereur" > > > fut publié à Copenhague. > > > En decembre 2009 la même Copenhague honore > > > le Clima-Empereur Obama affublé des habits > > > tissés du vent, dont il jure d'étouffer > > > l'Echauffement Climatique. > > > Reste-t-il encore un enfant qui osera dire > > > que l'Empereur est nu? > > > > Editeur Createspace > > > ISBN 1449917518 > > > > Georges Metanomski > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > Google Groups "Epistemology" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
