I'd start at New Scientist Chaz. On 20 Dec, 10:44, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote: > I have searched in vain for any evidence that CO2 is a significant > greenhouse gas. > According to radiometric dating of Carbon isotopes it is thought the > the amount of CO2 has increased from 0.028% - 0,038% in the last 100 > years. > Unless Carbon has some magical properties is seems unlikely that such > tiny concentrations should cause any significant increase in > temperature, even-though it is a greenhouse gas. > Can any one help me find the scientific evidence? > I don't want to the political answer, nor the circumstantial answer, > nor any sceptic/denier/doubter information as I have heard it all. > What I want is the basic physical science of carbon that suggests that > a 0,01% increase can be held responsible for a proposed 1 degree > increase in temperature.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
