O, beware, my lord, of fatuity! It is the cross-eyed monster which doth glance at conceit and ignorance and mock the meat it feeds on Georges
--- On Thu, 12/24/09, physicsup.com <[email protected]> wrote: > From: physicsup.com <[email protected]> > Subject: [epistemology 11108] physicsup.com- This all what was published > between 20-10- 09 and 20-11- 09 > To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, December 24, 2009, 7:38 AM > > > Physics New Theory > physicsup.com > This all what was published between 20-10- 09 and 20-11- > 09 > After Days all the theory > http://www.physicsup.com > http://www.physics-up.com > I know a very little English > Need grammar particularity > > Fundamentals of the unification theory of materials > 1- Introduction > 2- Hypotheses and Theory > 3- Optical phenomena > 4- Energy and Motion > > Introduction > > Objectives of the theory > > > There is a need for a single unified theory, could explain > all the > phenomena of nature. And shorten all theories of physics in > one, able > to explain and interpret all what interpreted by earlier > theories. At > the conclusions for the future of the realities of the > universe. And > interpretation of what all theories can not be interpreted > or > understood by old theories. Then put a convincing > philosophical theory > based on scientific facts, which no doubt, unite the human > spirit, and > do not accept the interpretation. Unite all the forces in > nature on > the basis that is properties of the material. And give > causal > explanation of all events. To be simple and streamlined, as > the > simplicity of the universe. And give explanations on > the > interpretation that other theories failed. > This theory is different and clashing with the old > concepts, but not > with the truth, a single, unified comprehensive and > integrated manner, > the basis of truth. The most important thing is unified > among the laws > that apply to the solar system with the atom laws, it is > causal theory > of distinction. > most of our concepts of physics, were based on fallacious > grounds. the > wave characteristics of the particles, and zero mass, > And idle talk > about the fourth dimension, jumps of Niels Bohr electrons, > the myopia > of grand explosion theory, madness of mathematics and > dimensions in > superstrings > theory. > > That this theory, identify the black holes, dark matter, > and > sunspots. The earth's Warming, and the effects of the space > shuttle > out on the climate and gravity. And provide a deeper > understanding of > the so-called forces of nature, and a definition of the > charge, and > have the ability to give causal answers, to all the > phenomena of > nature. > Dr: Sadi S Mona > > > > > > > Hypotheses and Theory > > > > > Assumptions and theoretical > > First: The atomic > model is currently being used is not valid, > and there is another model reflects the reality of the > atom. > And can explain all optical > phenomena, on the basis of the new > model, as well as the new model can , > Unite the forces of nature on the > basis, that it is properties of > the material. > Second: repair > corrupted theories. and nonsense that have > been made to the knowledge of physics. > Say at the outset that there are two > types of atoms: - a strong > nucleus atoms, and weak nucleus atoms. > Atoms are neutral in the normal > position, a condition in > addition to the atom, equalizer particles. > > > Dr: Sadi Said Mona > > > > > > > Hypotheses > > > I will start assumptions, and I say > that there is no limits for > the matter of the universe. That the universe is unlimited > in his > littleness of its parts or bigness of its parts. If we find > in our > measurement limits, then this universe, is part of the real > universe. > The real universe is far greater than we measure. > As for the lower limits of particles. > There is no limit to the > small mass of material. It is wrong to regard the particles > of light, > particles with zero mass. There are mass of material > has a mass less > than the mass of particle of light. If we increased the > accuracy of > our measurements, we can found smaller blocks of the mass > than > particle of light. > The matter or material: did not > exterminate does not create but > develop. > No beginning no end of the matter. > Allowed to exist in parts of > the universe develops or beginnings and endings. > Exist in the universe only to the > material. And that energy is > moving of matter or material, nothing else. > These assumptions and laws that we > will adopt it, I do not want > to prove now. Some are proved and the other I will > demonstrate later, > so as not to prolong the issue now. > > > > > Dr: Sadi S > Mona > > > > > > Character of particles > > The particles of light and elementary > particles are polarized > particles, charged, and, have mass. Based on the > experiments of > Stolitov and Libidev. These particles do exist within the > atom. > The new model explains the > structure of the atom, and its > importance for physics. I say that the new atomic model, is > able to > solve all the problems of physics easer than the > others. Either keep > hold of old physics. But is an injustice to mankind, > or to accept the > truth. > There is an equation of energy easy, simple > and best of Einstein > equation one million times. > I will put the new form of atom > soon. > > > > > Dr: Sadi S > Mona > > > > > > Charges > > Before > putting the new atomic model, we should understand > the structure of elementary particles. and identify the > charge. > All the > elementary particles, including particles of light, > consisting of groups of Mona, strong and weak, and Mona > groups has a > combination similar to the structure of atoms but smallest, > if you > wish, but this only temporarily. If the amount of Mona > strong groups > dominate on weak Mona groups, in this particle, we said > that this > particle is positive, and if the amount of weak Mona groups > more > effective. We say that this a negative particle. Add that > all this > talk has no scientific meaning, but will reveal later, and > this fact > will prove itself automatically. But I want to say, that > every > particle is composed of groups, and not of a homogeneous > body as we > thought before. Groups of Mona, weak and strong. In > different rates, > which sets a charge particle. > This > talk is currently weak and temporary, It is of great > importance in the interpretation of all the phenomena of > nature, > easy, and this will be seen later. Everything in nature > without > exaggeration. > No quacks > > > > > Dr: Sadi S > Mona > > > > > > Equalizer particles > > In general atom > consists of a positively charged nucleus and > electrons are negatively charged. And another guest I'll > call: > Equalizer particles. Particles of positive charge and > negative > charge. It differs from the photons, it is > significantly different > in every thing. > > The first Low: says that the atomic > charge of any atom, is less > than half of electron charge, if not in addition of > equalizer > particles. When we add Equalizer particles, atom > become almost > neutral. > Now there an atoms have a nuclei charge > strongest, of the total > charge of electrons, this nuclei we title strong. Or strong > nuclei > atoms , or strong atoms. > There are an atoms have nuclei charge weak > relative to the total > charge of electrons, this nuclei we title weak, or weak > nuclei atoms, > or weak atoms. > An example of the weak atoms is iron, and > the strong atom oxygen or > hydrogen. > Now to balance the charge of the > atoms. It must be added to the > atom equalizer particles, positive or negative, according > to the type > of element. > This applies to most elements > of the periodic table. But not > all. And here comes to mind, that more elements of earth, > are the > elements of weak nuclei. Add that in our planet > positive equalizer > particles are rare The negative is in abundance. > If so, we can: interpretation the status of the > material, Causal > explanation. > We know that the strong nuclei atoms need to negative > equalizer > particles > to because neutral strong nuclei atoms, they get > them easily, they > becomes a neutral atom or above neutral atoms, become > liquid then > gas. The neutral is liquid. > But if the element of weak atoms nuclei, it can not get or > obtain > everything > of what it wants. and it remains in solid state. > And solid-state different degrees, If the difference > between the > nuclei charge and the charges of electrons significantly > big, The atom > needs a big amount of positive particles in order to become > a liquid > or gas. This explain the heat needed to melt metals. and > the variation > in what is required for each element of them. > If that Temperature, is particles are added to the > atom, not motion > of molecular as we thought before. > But in appearance like motion of molecules, but not > the truth of > causation of what happened. > > > > > Dr: Sadi S > Mona > > > > > > > Reciprocity or far gravity > > We consider that the earth have > neutral charge and this is > true for the inhabitants of the earth. For an observer from > outside > the Earth > That is not true or incorrect, > because most of the elements of > the planet or the proportion of the most, are weak nucleus > elements, > this in comparative to the elements of the sun > That mean the earth have > negative charge, and the sun > positively charged. for that the our planet needed to get > positive > particles from the sun. > And the sun need to get negative > particles to her stability from > our planet. > For those who say gravity is much > weaker than the charge. We > would tell them that the ratio of charge is equal to > the amount or > quantity of cargo divided on the mass. Second low. > For example, the greater the mass, > decreased ratio of charge . > and remember: that the charge of atom less than half > electron charge. > And because, to the atoms were added equalizer particles, > which reduce > the charge. > Further, the elements of earth is made > of two types of elements, > weak and strong together, for that the difference in the > charge will > be much much much less. > It is important to know that the > rate of charge is much less when > the mass is greater . > It is important to know, that what > happens between the electron > and the nucleus is the same as what occurs between the > earth and the > sun, The reciprocity. > Depending on the law of the proportion of the > ratio of charge . > Here we have a little stretch to > the new atomic model, and we got > an understanding of Far gravity, one of the qualities of > the matter. > Every day I will explain a new > quick understanding of forces, > From the forces of nature, and a > deeper explanation of the > universe. What concerns me is what I present to humanity > and not to > get an award. > We must rename the gravity, and called it reciprocity > because > reciprocity more general and comprehensive and interactive, > it not > limited to what is happening between the stars and its > planets, but on > what happens between the nucleus and accessories as well. > > > > Dr: > Sadi S Mona > > > > > > Note > > This theory requires the material > support of those who love truth > to win, and scientific institutions, in order to be able to > use an > efficiency interpreter. Perhaps the majority did not grasp > what I > write. However, some nationalities, who mastered the Arabic > language > are the first to have been convinced, and take care of this > theory, > they try to formulate a language, and translate well. And > claiming > that they are the their own. And other hackers. > > > > Here is a summary overview of the new atomic form to: > > Black holes and the invisible universe > > First: We as human beings see the > positive light and positive > equalizer particles, but negative equalizer particles we do > not see > them, that mean we see positive light particles only. > Any group of strong > nuclei as the sun, or the nucleus of > oxygen, it sends to the outside of the group positive > particles, > different from the radioactive elements. And depends on > several > factors will put it in a timely manner. And any weak > nucleus group, > absorbs the positive particles. These weak groups, > considered as the > unseen world. The stars absorbent to light. I consider it > to be stars, > not black holes, they are like nuclei of absorbent > particles and > positive particles are similar to anti-particles. That is, > negative > nuclei, and positive orbital charge. > That the difference > between the invisible universe and black > holes is that the group be weak nucleus, and not a negative > nucleus, > and absorbs the positive particles. > In the black holes, the > star itself absorbed positive objects > and positive particles. > > Here we have > another understanding of the antibody. Also, > there are anti-atoms and anti stars .Too. > > Black Holes > > I want to point out that black holes, are stars only > negatively > charged, and this according to my theory. These stars > absorbs > positively charged particles, because the composition of > most of the > atoms of the star are type weak nuclei, we see the star > like a hole. > > Dr Sadi S Mona > > > > Black spots solar > > It is the volcanoes > only occur on the surface of the sun, and > issued a negative particle rather than positive particles > resulting > from a volcano on the Earth's surface. These particles > absorbs from > the solar surface. No ray is issued from them. > For those who believe in > the sun occur nuclear reactions, in > order to give us this energy, or particles, is in > preparation or fully > wrong. That the sun gives positive particles in the process > of > reciprocity, and take from the planets negative particles, > it is > purely an interactive process. > > > Dr: Sadi S Mona > > > > > Note > > What I want people to say about > me: that I am the first how > but the correct foundations for physics science. > That the model of atomic evolve > gradually. When we complete the > theory, we have come to the model, the closest thing to the > truth. but > It is not the whole truth. > What type currently is a summary. > And will go further in the > future in each case separately. > > > > > Weak nuclear force, and strong nuclear forces > > In the weak nuclear > force the nucleus are of a size and > mass larger than usual, and almost neutral. The nucleus is > trying to > get rid of this excess of the mass size and non-compatible > with its > tropics group. > In the strong nuclear forces, > the nucleus are almost neutral, > and neutral have close similarities qualities, to qualities > of liquid. > If the nucleus stoned appropriate external particle unable > to access > the nucleus. It is easy to split and disintegrate part of > it. These > particles released from detritus off the atom, which have > different > sizes so it has the equation, different from Einstein's > equation, in > all aspects. > Equation is: energy is equal to the total mass > released multiplied > by the average speed square. > And not the speed of light. True if the > nucleus release visible > light only. And nothing else. > Most of our concepts of > physics, were based on fallacious > grounds. Came in.: wave characteristics of the particles, > and mass > zero, and idle talk about the fourth dimension, etc.. > > > > > > Planets attraction > of its accessories and expulsion > > At the outset, I say that > this force varies dramatically with > far gravity, or gravity between the stars and planets. And > we call it > attraction. It is not our goal to increase the number of > forces, but > understanding the truth is correct, on the basis that > everything that > happens in nature depends on the characteristics of the > material. And > to access to the truth. > We know a lot of planets > and stars and it attracts of the > objects, and this attraction is not commensurate with its > mass, and > bodies mass. There are many examples of this. In some of > the giant > planets, we find that the attraction does not differ or > only slightly > differ from the Earth's attraction. > How can we assure their laws. And find > that attractive in a big > planet, is less than the Earth's attraction. Indeed, what > happens is > that some planet's are trying to increase there planet's > mass, making > them more stable in space. And there on the contrary, > planets want to > get rid of its mass. Some stars also get rid of the excess > mass. > Nuclei get rid of excess mass. There are several factors, > reliable > pull or expulsion, including mass objects, the proportion > of there > charges, the amount of there charges , distance of > the body from the > surface. That is, one of the properties of the material and > there are > other properties contrary to it. > > > > > Electricity and Magnetism > > We have said previously that > any object or particle can be > polarized. And the group as well. Body contains Mona > strong particles > part, more than the other part, it becomes polarized. And > the Earth as > well. > Now talking about magnets and say that: an > iron has polarized > atoms in the metal which is found randomly, and if we order > them, some > particles go out of the tropical group, because its > existence, > upsetting the balance of the group. And most of these > particles > revolve in the same direction. It is important to know that > these > field are particles, and these particles have the ability > to move > other particles, inside elements that its particles can be > moved, such > as copper, for example. The action of moving a few > particles of the > material into a wire for example, is what we call > electricity. The > issuance of these particles from the point of resistance, > is what we > call the beam, if we were invisible particles that this > visible light, > and this depends on the nature of the resistance and the > quality of > particle and particle mass and the amount of current to the > end. > > Note: - The one space object, can > increase magnetic globe, or > reverse its magnetic pole, this depends on his cargo of > space object > and where it landed. > > > > > > > > > The New atomic form > > That the atom consists of nucleus and electrons and other > particles of > different size and moonlet, There is no a difference > between atom and > the sun group or any other group constellations. > Now that the quantity of groups Mona positive > and negative, that > construction the particle. Or the amount of a strong > nucleus of atoms, > and weak nucleus which is the body. The mass of the body or > the > particle to the Group, are what determines what is the body > or > particle, and what the direction of the group and disposal > of objects > and other groups. > All of these particles and objects and groups > polarized charged > and have mass, which is part and parcel of the atom. It > remains to say > that there is an atoms have nuclei charge, stronger than > the orbital > particles. Or atoms have nuclei charge weaker than the > orbital > particles. Furthermore, there are positive nuclei, also > negative > nuclei, and their tropical bodies are positive. Exist > between these > objects and particle mass close to a neutral state and with > a big > block and another with a smaller of the normal and far from > the > neural. > And in this sense we can explain what is happening > in the universe > and the nature. Here, I want to abolish the concept of > power of the > nature, and replaced it by the concept of properties of the > material. > As we have already seen, how they have Standardization of > the forces > of nature or by force and arbitrary, on the similarities > and not by > the attributes. > > All that was explained earlier is a > summary, for testing the new > model, no more, and I will soon go deeper in each subject > suggested > above. > Although most of the explanations, and frames of the > theory, become > clear. > > > > > Black Holes > > I want to point out that black holes, are stars only > negatively > charged, and this according to my theory. These stars > absorbs > positively charged particles, because the composition of > most of the > atoms of the star are type weak nuclei, we see the star > like a hole. > Dr Sadi S Mona > > > > > > > > Optical phenomena > > > Note > > This theory belongs to all, > anyone can develop it as he wants, > how much student better than there teachers. > > Soon will be the formulation > of the theory mathematically, but > we want to make sure first, that it is able to explain all > the > phenomena of nature, and it is compatible with the truth, > and then be > mathematically formulated, and because it is not all what > mathematics > comes is the reality, you will see how many theory will > shatter soon, > and they have the most beautiful mathematics in those > theories. > > Greetings to everyone who sent me > a message, I hope that you will > not messaging, more than two lines, because I find it very > difficult > to translate the messages. There are people I will never > forget their > names all my life, they inspired me and gave me the > perseverance. > > > > > > Optical > phenomena > > > > At the outset we know that the > particles of light that we see, is > only a small group, between the other particles, the > smaller mass > particles and the largest mass particles of particles of > light. And > other particles with different recipes somewhat. There is > an easy > interpretation of the phenomena Revocation particle of > light such as > reflection. Now we will look to each phenomenon > separately. > > But before we begin, > we must remember the law of the > proportion of the charge, and quantity of the charge. And > particles is > charged, and with mass, and polarizing. And any particle of > light > particles composed of groups not significant smoothly. > > We do not deny that the atoms or > particles can moving undulation, > such as the materialism waves of the sea. But this does not > mean that > the particle of light have wave properties > at all. > > > This is a summary of the main > points in each phenomenon > > Refraction > > In fracture, blue particle is the > biggest mass, the red light the > smaller mass , and is the largest amount of cargo, it > interacts with > more intense with thick environment than the red. > Therefore, the > speed slows more, and its deviation is greater, when he > entered the > thick environment. > This means that the total particle interacts > with atoms in the > environment of this dense material that is causing the > slow, angle > there is no dispute over its interpretation. Left as > quickly as he > entered, it is because he did not friction into, and had > not been > subjected to friction, but the Mona constituent groups, was > interact > with the thick environment material. > > > Diffraction > > In the diffraction, what happens to the > board of material, with > weak nuclei, negatively charged particle, for the positive > particles, > It attracts red particles more easily, to the board, and > separated it > from the beam, more than the large particle, how have > larger mass and > relatively lower proportion of the charge. > > > > Interference > > Such as diffraction , but added: > In interference there is two types > of particles, interference in > the same area of the fall, if we collected the two > particles Codes and > divided at two, we know if we can see, or do not see the > light in the > fall. The following example shows how. If we assume that > red particle > code is 7, and blue code is 4, and we see the light with > codes from 4 > to 7, problem solved, simply. > As for the areas of visible and > invisible, it is because only > one reason, that we do not see these particles, not because > there are > no particles, but they are either ultraviolet or infrared. > > > > > Polarization > > We have stated that most of the > particles are polarized > particles, that one of the poles contains weak nuclei Mona > groups, > more than the other pole, particles have bipolar, and that > these > particles exist in the beam, random-polarized. > When radiation pass a material > that have polarized properties, or > of a space net, such as tourmaline crystals, this > material work to > arrange the particles beam, so that each pole of a > particle, opposite > to the pole opposite the other in the particle. > tourmaline > organizing the beam, and send it to the right and left. > when we but > other plate of tourmaline, perpendicular, the other plate > work on > moving the rest light, to the bottom and top. > > > > These are principles, and the rest are > similar to other theories, > to be replace of, frequency and wavelength, to the > proportion of the > charge and the quantity of the charge. > What we see in electroscope are in > fact groups of particles, in > the form of waves. This means that the sum of these > particles are > waves, like material waves of the sea. But lonely one > particle, does > not have the waves properties at all. > We see in electroscope, waves of > particles, not a material wave, > or particle who have waves properties. > > > > > > Energy and Motion > > Energy > > > This theory, is the revolution in physics, > and will cause a > revolution in all of science. It looks at the issue of > energy, from > another perspective, based on a new basis; a scientific > revolution is > real, against all deviant thoughts and misguided. > Start, there are particles moving to objects, > such as particles of > light, and there are other objects move and produce > particles, such as > wind, objects move, and moves other objects such as > bullets, or > materials turn into other materials, and give particle to > the > surroundings, such as burning oil. > The common divisor that is mass and > moving particles, then, is > moving of masses, exploited intelligently. This topic is > long and very > beautiful, which make easier for us, to better energy > utilization, in > addition to finding alternative energies will be easy, > based on the > principles of the theory. > Now the definition of energy: it is the > moving material. > > Dr: Sadi S. Mona > > > > > > > > Warming of the atmosphere > > > > We do agree, and we support, who says that > the phenomenon of > global warming, as a result of the increase in some gases, > are causing > global warming. As well as warming leads to global > warming. > But we look at this issue from another angle, > that is, from the > viewpoint of the theory. > The warming, caused by positive > particles, from the physical > transformations, such as combustion or war or nuclear bombs > ... Etc.. > And that increased warming on Earth, leading to disruption > of cross- > interaction between the earth and the sun. > We know that the earth takes positive > particles from the sun, and > give negative particles, and the distance between the sun > and the > Earth is totally dependent, the need for the two blocs for > the > exchange of particles, the increase of positive particles > on the Earth > surface, leading to less need for exchange with the sun, > and then > change the distance between the Earth and the sun, or > changes in the > Earth's orbit around the sun, albeit slightly, leading to > an uneven > ground in orbit around the sun, and with the other planets > also, and > run level, possibly a disaster for humans, don't have > solution. > > The exit of objects with weak nuclei > atoms, such as space vehicles, > out of the area of the globe, this result in a decrease of, > weak > nuclei atoms, low ratio of weak nuclei elements, making the > land more > neutralization. > > > > > > > How to solve soon > > > > http://www.physicsup.com > http://www.physics-up.com > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Groups "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
