--- On Thu, 12/24/09, Julio Hernandez <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Julio Hernandez <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [epistemology 11112] physicsup.com- This all what was published > between 20-10- 09 and 20-11- 09 > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, December 24, 2009, 11:59 PM > I don't understand why who invents > a new theory doesn't publish it first in a good journal, > but in an open forum. Is this a pre-peer-review?, is it a > test due to insecurity? > > With kind regards, > Julio J. Hernandez > =========================== G: Without commenting in any way the particular theory in question: No "good" journal will consider, let alone publish any writing by somebody lacking "proper" credentials, such as a PhD, a position in some recognized scientific institute and recommendations of the boss, or some recognized authorities. The so called "peer reviews" are modern version of inquisition. By definition there are no "peers" for really new ideas, which may only pass - ununderstood - the inquisition barrier when coming from a recognized celebrity. Special Relativity would never be published without Planck's support. Bose Statistics - without Einstein's support. And Schwarzschild's metric written on brown paper in the trenches of the Russian front, would never see light if Einstein did not publish it, honestly giving the credit to Schwarzschild. Regards Georges. ______________________________________________________________________ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
