Georges must have switched on more than a few light bulbs Chaz. On 6 Jan, 15:07, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote: > It's all very interesting but was there any such thing as a first > enlightenment? > > On Dec 30 2009, 6:21 pm, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > ========== > > Reminder: > > > The present thread is destined to discuss the rationality of the > > Second Enlightenment as well as to inquire into the sources of > > the irrational manipulation of masses and to look for remediation. > > Its basic structure is: > > > X1. Scientific Revolution > > X2. Ontology > > X3. Ideology > > X4. Social awareness > > X5. Establishment > > > with X=F/S respectively for the first/second enlightenment. > > We start by the first enlightenment as guidance to the formulation > > of the second and warning of errors to be avoided. > > ============ = > > Originally the thread was meant as a chain of posts, but proved much > > too voluminous and I upload it progressively to my site. > > The so far uploaded sections are: > > F1.Scientific Revolution and F2.Ontology of the first enlightenment > > inhttp://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/ESSAYS/second_enlightenment_F1_F... > > F3.Ideology of the first enlightenment > > inhttp://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/ESSAYS/second_enlightenment_F3.html > > F4.Social awareness and F5.Establishment of the first enlightenment > > inhttp://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/ESSAYS/second_enlightenment_F4_F... > > S1.Scientific Revolution and S2.Ontology of the second enlightenment > > inhttp://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/ESSAYS/second_enlightenment_S1_S... > > > Georges.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
