Sorry - I didn't get a word of that.
On Jan 15, 8:03 pm, "Serenity Smiles" <[email protected]> wrote: > I have an antidote perhaps, hit them with the sims computer game "mess with > life" me Serenity Smiles, I always said the Caths want me dead and side with > there behind looking creation!!! the (green emerald jewel on the cover, was > a visualisation that belongs to me). > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "chazwin" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 8:13 PM > To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]> > Subject: [epistemology 11184] Re: Second Enlightenment (S1,S2) > > > Oh yeah! > > The E is a pain in the academic butt! > > Its a clear example of the theoretical tail waging the historical dog. > > What was once a "war on religion" has become a cosy political correct > > relativism club that lets in the Christians. > > It's a bit of a sore point at the moment as I have to finish 5,000 > > words by Monday on it. > > > On Jan 14, 12:57 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Georges must have switched on more than a few light bulbs Chaz. > > >> On 6 Jan, 15:07, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > It's all very interesting but was there any such thing as a first > >> > enlightenment? > > >> > On Dec 30 2009, 6:21 pm, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > ========== > >> > > Reminder: > > >> > > The present thread is destined to discuss the rationality of the > >> > > Second Enlightenment as well as to inquire into the sources of > >> > > the irrational manipulation of masses and to look for remediation. > >> > > Its basic structure is: > > >> > > X1. Scientific Revolution > >> > > X2. Ontology > >> > > X3. Ideology > >> > > X4. Social awareness > >> > > X5. Establishment > > >> > > with X=F/S respectively for the first/second enlightenment. > >> > > We start by the first enlightenment as guidance to the formulation > >> > > of the second and warning of errors to be avoided. > >> > > ============ = > >> > > Originally the thread was meant as a chain of posts, but proved much > >> > > too voluminous and I upload it progressively to my site. > >> > > The so far uploaded sections are: > >> > > F1.Scientific Revolution and F2.Ontology of the first enlightenment > >> > > inhttp://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/ESSAYS/second_enlightenment_F1_F... > >> > > F3.Ideology of the first enlightenment > >> > > inhttp://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/ESSAYS/second_enlightenment_F3.html > >> > > F4.Social awareness and F5.Establishment of the first enlightenment > >> > > inhttp://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/ESSAYS/second_enlightenment_F4_F... > >> > > S1.Scientific Revolution and S2.Ontology of the second enlightenment > >> > > inhttp://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/ESSAYS/second_enlightenment_S1_S... > > >> > > Georges. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Epistemology" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
