if by your assumption and your claim is - infinity<=x<=+infinity then this
ends up in a tie (zero) so i can call is void or empty. I would love to know
more about this you are talking about...

gidmakus

2010/2/22 garshagu <[email protected]>

> Socratus,
> You'll then appreciate mathematicians' concept of boundedness.
> Specifically I can assure you that the universe (x spherical space)
> simply has open lower and upper boundaries; i.e. minus-infinity less
> than or equal to x less than or equal to plus-infinity.
> Also the two inertia frames are not contradictory, mathematically: The
> only problem is in the attempt to unify them into one function. Give
> me a short while from now and I'll provide a simplistic model that may
> pull together the two electron-quark speeds into one single function.
> You'll accept or reject the model.
> Atovigba.
>
> On Jan 29, 12:09 am, socratus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The Lorentz transformation,  Minkowski space.
> > ===========.
> > The Galilean transformation belongs to each inertial frame.
> > The Galilean transformation fails to preserve Maxwell's equations.
> > Why the Galilean transformation useless in the Maxwell's equations?
> > Because Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations)
> > don’t belong to inertial frames.
> > Because Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations)
> >  belong to another reference frame. Which?
> > What are Lorentz transformations?
> > Of course, now everybody thinks that difference between
> >  these two math equations (conceptions) lies only in
> >  speed’s distinction.
> > Such understanding leads to all kinds of confusions.
> > #
> > What is Lorentz transformation?
> > The Lorentz transformation describes transformation
> >  of all particle’s physical parameters in the time of transition
> > from one inertial frame to some kind of another reference frame.
> > Is this ‘another reference frame’ inertial?
> > No. Why?
> > In 1905 Poincare wrote that the Lorentz transformation creates
> >  math group, which conforms of arise turning- point in the space,
> >  which we call now 4D Minkowski space.
> > Again.
> > The Lorentz transformation describes the event in Minkowski space.
> > This math group describes rotation ( something that has three
> >  dimensions parameters) in the 4D Minkowski space.
> > The Lorentz transformation describes only the transformations
> > ( rotation) of particle in the 4D Minkowski space.
> > #
> > Many physicists, including George FitzGerald, Joseph Larmor,
> >  Hendrik Lorentz and Woldemar Voigt, had been discussing
> > the physics behind these equations since 1887.
> >  Larmor and Lorentz, who believed the luminiferous ether hypothesis,
> > were seeking the transformation under which Maxwell's equations
> > were invariant when transformed from the ether to a moving frame.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation
> > #
> > In this rotation Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations)
> >  change the homogenous and isotropic structure of Aether.
> > Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations) create new
> > spherical reference frame.
> > #
> > Early in 1889, Oliver Heaviside had shown from Maxwell's equations
> >  that the electric field surrounding a spherical distribution of
> > charge
> > should cease to have spherical symmetry once the charge is in motion
> >  relative to the ether.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation
> > #
> > Of course, only I as a layman, can think that Lorentz
> >  transformation which creates math group in 4D Minkowski
> > space describes the behavior of real particle- photon/ electron.
> > In the books is written that this is only math trick, which
> > philosophically absurd and doesn’t have any real physical sense.
> > #
> > Now consider that Minkowski space is a good description in an
> >  infinitesimally small region surrounding any point
> > ( barring gravitational singularities).
> > The structure of Minkowski space doesn’t have gravity.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space
> > #
> > In my opinion the Universe ( as a whole) doesn’t have gravity.
> >  The detected material mass of the  matter in the Universe is so small
> > (the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
> >   p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it  cannot ‘close’ the Universe into sphere
> > and
> >  therefore our Universe  as whole is ‘open’, flat , endless Vacuum.
> >
> > Therefore the 4D Minkowski metric is applied to the Universe as a
> > whole.
> > And the General Relativity only applies in a local flat 4D Minkowski
> > space.
> > =========.
> > Best wishes.
> > Israel Sadovnik  Socratus
> >  ===============.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Epistemology" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to