if by your assumption and your claim is - infinity<=x<=+infinity then this ends up in a tie (zero) so i can call is void or empty. I would love to know more about this you are talking about...
gidmakus 2010/2/22 garshagu <[email protected]> > Socratus, > You'll then appreciate mathematicians' concept of boundedness. > Specifically I can assure you that the universe (x spherical space) > simply has open lower and upper boundaries; i.e. minus-infinity less > than or equal to x less than or equal to plus-infinity. > Also the two inertia frames are not contradictory, mathematically: The > only problem is in the attempt to unify them into one function. Give > me a short while from now and I'll provide a simplistic model that may > pull together the two electron-quark speeds into one single function. > You'll accept or reject the model. > Atovigba. > > On Jan 29, 12:09 am, socratus <[email protected]> wrote: > > The Lorentz transformation, Minkowski space. > > ===========. > > The Galilean transformation belongs to each inertial frame. > > The Galilean transformation fails to preserve Maxwell's equations. > > Why the Galilean transformation useless in the Maxwell's equations? > > Because Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations) > > don’t belong to inertial frames. > > Because Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations) > > belong to another reference frame. Which? > > What are Lorentz transformations? > > Of course, now everybody thinks that difference between > > these two math equations (conceptions) lies only in > > speed’s distinction. > > Such understanding leads to all kinds of confusions. > > # > > What is Lorentz transformation? > > The Lorentz transformation describes transformation > > of all particle’s physical parameters in the time of transition > > from one inertial frame to some kind of another reference frame. > > Is this ‘another reference frame’ inertial? > > No. Why? > > In 1905 Poincare wrote that the Lorentz transformation creates > > math group, which conforms of arise turning- point in the space, > > which we call now 4D Minkowski space. > > Again. > > The Lorentz transformation describes the event in Minkowski space. > > This math group describes rotation ( something that has three > > dimensions parameters) in the 4D Minkowski space. > > The Lorentz transformation describes only the transformations > > ( rotation) of particle in the 4D Minkowski space. > > # > > Many physicists, including George FitzGerald, Joseph Larmor, > > Hendrik Lorentz and Woldemar Voigt, had been discussing > > the physics behind these equations since 1887. > > Larmor and Lorentz, who believed the luminiferous ether hypothesis, > > were seeking the transformation under which Maxwell's equations > > were invariant when transformed from the ether to a moving frame. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation > > # > > In this rotation Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations) > > change the homogenous and isotropic structure of Aether. > > Maxwell's equations ( Lorentz transformations) create new > > spherical reference frame. > > # > > Early in 1889, Oliver Heaviside had shown from Maxwell's equations > > that the electric field surrounding a spherical distribution of > > charge > > should cease to have spherical symmetry once the charge is in motion > > relative to the ether. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation > > # > > Of course, only I as a layman, can think that Lorentz > > transformation which creates math group in 4D Minkowski > > space describes the behavior of real particle- photon/ electron. > > In the books is written that this is only math trick, which > > philosophically absurd and doesn’t have any real physical sense. > > # > > Now consider that Minkowski space is a good description in an > > infinitesimally small region surrounding any point > > ( barring gravitational singularities). > > The structure of Minkowski space doesn’t have gravity. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space > > # > > In my opinion the Universe ( as a whole) doesn’t have gravity. > > The detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small > > (the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately > > p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it cannot ‘close’ the Universe into sphere > > and > > therefore our Universe as whole is ‘open’, flat , endless Vacuum. > > > > Therefore the 4D Minkowski metric is applied to the Universe as a > > whole. > > And the General Relativity only applies in a local flat 4D Minkowski > > space. > > =========. > > Best wishes. > > Israel Sadovnik Socratus > > ===============. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
