Thank you for the clarity---I am doing a small publication on the *"Power of Dimensional Thinking"---* where i rhetorically discuss some of these issues.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> wrote: > > The problem we have is--you can not measure or define a discontinuity to > which you are part of--time as measured by clocks is a discontinuity--but > time as intuited represents a continuity. > > =============== > G: > Thanks for your interest. The problem is not simple; perhaps most > complex of all rational ontological foundations. I probably muddled it, > and you did not get the gist of what I intended to say. > I said, rightly or wrongly, that I am the intuited continuum of > time or awareness. Discrete events don't need to be defined, as they > are experienced, thus given and represent the "world" which > I ( (my) continuous awareness) perceive. > > I repeat the link. Reread it if you have nothing better to do. > > http://findgeorges.com/CORE/A_FOUNDATIONS/a1_time_awareness_and_events.html > > Georges > ============== > > > > > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- nubiaafrika.blogspot.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
