Thanks but I should have headed it 'whose' not 'who's' I've been reading some Adorno - can you tell?
On May 1, 1:23 pm, einseele <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi chaz > > Good to hear you back, and good post! > I want to sign it too. > Objects are excluded, yes, the vanish between what is called here > concepts > > best > > On 30 abr, 21:09, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Concepts exclude > > Concepts never exhaust the object they hope to describe. > > There is no meaning without dialectical engagement > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Epistemology" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
