> > Not so. Making it for sale is the issue. > > Yes infringing my right to sell freely
As we also infringe on your right to rob banks freely. > > Again, not so.Such matters end up in civil courts. > > If you institute some form of "loser pays" rule, there would be little > > burden on the taxpayer. > > So would it be worth taking a 16 year old kid to court for downloading > the latest DVD? No. But it was well worth it for Polaroid to take Kodak to court for patent violation. > > > THis is just stupid. No rules are obeyed without legal sanction. > > > The few that do occur would be more borderline cases requiring a > > judge. > > But the scenario is nowhere nearly as dire as you portray it. > > Its not dire - it is what we have already - imperfect and in need of > more government to > protect and enforce -not less. > Government is neither wiser nor more benevolent than the citizenry. And the self-interests of government too often conflict with the legitimate interests of the governed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
