The funny part is that if you pay the same attention to your wonderful theory as you pay to a simple post sequence, then memes are screwed :-)
You continue to confirm my own theory. The main object in your position, is what you call the "I". And please tell Marion Blute that if the bollock below: > ...Your argument are just as relative to genes > (which cannot be defined as specific units) since the relationship > between form and function is not based upon one-to-one but one-to-many > and many-to-one (as they are with memes). Can only deserve "unconstructive reactions", this is simply trash, buy a book instead believing your "hobby" leads you anywhere -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
