Thanks--we all do--but at the rate we are churning MAD'S, and gobbling all known things in our site---in the name of progress--i fear for your/my/our daughters-- and sons---they may have a boiling planet as heritage--from a greedy generation of humanoids.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:45 PM, einseele <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because annihilation is something you fear. I do > Why shouldn't I feel that. I love my children and I dont want them in > the hell of apocalypse-like scenarios, even if mankind evil speeches > justify that > > > > On 15 jul, 09:40, awori achoka <[email protected]> wrote: > > *This may sound anihilistic---but why should science and politics fear > the > > (natural)--self induced disappearance of the the human species---and it's > > consequential replacement with other beings---better equipped and > > endowed to cope with the vagaries of a system that--man has only > > been successful in boiling up? > > > >* > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:30 PM, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Interesting. I wonder what the unforeseen consequences would be and > > > whether we would be able to identify them with this device, should it > > > be used. > > > You could have a bigger one with a space ladder. > > > > > On Jul 15, 1:27 am, Sam Carana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > George, > > > > > > Here's a link to one of my posts describing geoengineering methods: > > >http://j.mp/spacehose > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > Sam Carana > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Georges Metanomski < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Sam: > > > > >> George, > > > > > > >> What are your thoughts on geoengineering, such as cloud > > > > >> brightening > > > > >> and other methods to reflect more sunshine back into > > > > >> space? > > > > > > >> Cheers! > > > > >> Sam Carana > > > > > ================= > > > > > G: > > > > > Hi Sam, nice to hear from you. > > > > > Of course, not greenhouse reduction, but some sort of > > > > > compensating for decreasing reflection power of melting > > > > > ices makes any theoretical sense. > > > > > As for practical I don't know most, so please, could you > > > > > send me links? > > > > > > > Only one I heard about is the proposal of some Japanese > > > > > to paint everything paintable, like roots, roofs, etc. > > > > > in white. Would have to be sturdy paint to hold the trafic, > > > > > wouldn't it? Economically hardly tenable, even theoretically. > > > > > I take such ideas with a grain of salt, but like to stay > > > > > open minded, so send me links. > > > > > > > Mankind thinking of influencing climate looks to me like a > > > > > mosquito trying to push around an elephant. All our nukes > > > > > would not deviate a single hurricane. > > > > > > > And yet, a collapse of the Yang Tse damm would tilt the > > > > > planet of its orbit. > > > > > > > So, don't know what to think and don't think thinking will do > > > > > much good. Worst case planning would be my answer (that would > > > > > still involve thinking). > > > > > > > Let me repeat bottom lines of my essay: > > > > > > > QUOTE > > > > > You may trigger an avalanche by pulling the trigger of your > > > > > gun, but you won't stop it by pushing back the trigger. > > > > > > > Which actions seem advisable in this light? > > > > > > > 1.Dissociate GW from Pollution, a distinct, equally critical > > > > > problem, which should be investigated in its own context, > > > > > unaffected by political divagations about the GW. > > > > > > > 2.Admit that GW is inevitable and start immediately to plan > > > > > actions aiming at saving millions endangered by inundations, > > > > > (expatriation, artificial islands, etc.) and other > > > > > sequels of the GW. > > > > > UNQUOTE > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > Georges. > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "Epistemology" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> > <epistemology%[email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> > > > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > > nubiaafrika.blogspot.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- nubiaafrika.blogspot.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
