*The scientific laws are already there in Nature. The scientists only discovered them and usually name them after themselves.
*I made such an observation some time back--and a shortsighted character in this forum hurled abuses. * * On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:39 PM, sadovnik socratus <[email protected]>wrote: > Evolution / Consciousness and Quantum of Light. > ==. > The scientific laws are already there in Nature. > The scientists only discovered them and usually name them after > themselves. > Maybe these laws were there by chance, but maybe these laws were > created > and set in motion which explain the evolution of Nature. > If the Universe was created by chance – we don't need consciousness. > But if the Universe was developed by way of evolution > ( from simple to complex ) it means it needed consciousness > for its development. > And then we have a question: > How and where was the first germ of consciousness born? > # > Can evolution be possible by chance? > No, because “ The second law of thermodynamics “ says the Universe > as whole goes to cold equilibrium ( T=0K) , to regress, to death. > So, by chance evolution is impossible. > Evolution means progress. But if evolution is progress > it must have consciousness to make this progress possible. > If it so, we have an astonishing situation. > In 1900 , Max Planck , trying to save the Universe from ice age > discovered > Quantum of Light. This Quantum of Light saves the Universe from > extinction, gives life and it means takes part in the Cosmic > evolution. > Question: > Does Quantum of Light have consciousness? > # > All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me > no nearer to the answer to the question ' What are light quanta?' > Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it, > but he is mistaken > / Albert Einstein / > # > "There is in particular one problem whose exhaustive > solution could provide considerable elucidation. > What becomes of the energy of a photon after complete emission?" > / Max Planck. Nobel Lecture, June 2, 1920 / > > This question still waits for its answer. > =======================. > Best wishes. > Israel Sadovnik. Socratus. > =============================. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<epistemology%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- nubiaafrika.blogspot.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
