According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistics, linguistics is
a science.  According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#Scientific_method,
science requires experimentation.  For your entertainment, what's
wrong with these papers about bare plurals?:

http://people.umass.edu/partee/docs/Dependent_Plurals_Partee.pdf
http://www.salt17.uconn.edu/Cohen.pdf
http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/TkxY2YzN/BPs.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.11.6511&rep=rep1&type=pdf
http://amor.cms.hu-berlin.de/~h2816i3x/Talks/GenericitySeattle.ho.pdf
http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/conferences/sub7/abstracts/sub7_filip.pdf
http://linguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/22/Zweig.pdf
http://dstmte.net/teaching/ling535_fall2004/material/kinds.pdf
http://homepages.nyu.edu/~ez255/downloads/IATL_dependent_plurals_handout.pdf

The authors of these papers do not report any experimentation,
therefore, these studies are not science.

I found only one paper with an experiment:

http://mercury.hau.ac.kr/kggc/Publications/SIGG/SIGG12/SIGG12201_HKKang.pdf

but it is flawed in some other ways.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to