Araya
yes to be, S.E. Y (Why) 2b?? 2b or not 2b that was the section, whether tis
nobler to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous trick cyclists
(Psychiatrists)??
is evidential in his story (history),
Her story:
Even though the psychiatists demanded it had to be "their way". They still
refuse to look after my mental health by simply telling the truth to those
who are in need of the information. Again I have tried to get the "system"
to do the right thing by providing the evidence and information that is
required to restore order in my house. Will it happen?? time will tell. I
will not hold my breath but it is as plain as the end of my white nose
(White Knows) White Tara knows the crock of shit spouted forth by those who
want to control and dominate through fear and violence. Fascism at its best
-----Original Message-----
From: Serenity Smiles
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 7:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [epistemology 11903] The beginning: where is it ?
At last I am heading in the right direction,
-----Original Message-----
From: sadovnik socratus
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 7:37 AM
To: Epistemology
Subject: [epistemology 11890] The beginning: where is it ?
The beginning: where is it ?
===.
The beginning of Universe can be:
‘ big bang’ , ‘closed- gravity’ or ‘open - empty’.
#
First question:
Where did the mass for ‘ big bang’ come from?
Second question:
Where did the mass for ‘closed- gravity’ come from?
It is clear that these two questions lead to the third question:
How can the real mass appear from ‘open - empty’ space?
#
In my opinion to answer to this question we need to analyze
three theories: QT, SRT and Theory of Ideal gas.
1
Ideal gas.
100% of physicists believe that Theory of Ideal gas is an
abstract theory with abstract – virtual particles.
And then something happens there
( a temperature or volume or pressure changes maybe by
god’s interference) and it becomes real physical gas with
real particles.
I don’t believe in their opinion, I don’t believe in their god.
I believe in science and therefore I say that only QT and SRT
can explain the changes in the Ideal gas.
Only QT and SRT can explain how the virtual world of Ideal gas
becomes real one.
2
QT.
Dirac’s quantum theory says that a ‘open - empty’ space-
- vacuum is not empty at all - virtual particles exist there.
But Dirac didn’t give us the physical parameters of this
‘open - empty’ vacuum space.
This its weak point .
3
SRT.
The basis of SRT is an abstract ( -4D).
This its weak point.
#
In my opinion, if instead of ( -4D) and Dirac’s space
we take the physical laws and parameters of Ideal gas -
- all abstractions disappear and the real
picture of Universe will appear in front of us.
=============.
All the best.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
==============================.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
