HMMMH

1) Awareness of Self -->> !Shazam! --->>
2) belief in belief --->> Boredom -->>
3) belief that change is possible --->> Creativity --->>
4) creation of transitional operational functions --->> Reinforcing --->>
5) transition using belief into belief that other concepts are possible 
besides belief and change -->> Diversification -->>
6) creation of intuition --->> Frustration -->>
7) creation of inspiration  --->> Greed --->>
8) creation of evaluation --->> Foresight -->>
9) creation of planning ---> Gimme !MORE! complexity -->>
10-65535 self development of innate characteristics in ones own state 
vector.
>>> ascent to GOD inspired further possibilities
>>> 2**24 ascent to Spirit
>>> 2**32 asent to GOD's helper status Deity
>>> 2**64 subordinate of GOD
>>> 2**256-2 crowding GOD at 2**256-1 innate characteristics... LOL LOL LOL
I recently was promoted to Spirit...

Lonnie Courtney Clay


On Tuesday, May 3, 2011 11:18:06 AM UTC-7, the taoist shaman wrote:
>
> lonnie u seem smart  , is there an end to self evolution ,. im i 
> crawling twards insanity by being a perfectionest or am i correct or 
> is there a state of "perfection" <------ of corse not perfection but 
> "perfection" compleat is what i think im getting at , is to view ones 
> self as whole to have delusions of grandure.   am i too smart for my 
> own good or too stuped 
>
> On Apr 28, 4:57 am, Lonnie Clay <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > Very Perceptive! Commence Evolving whenever pleased! Be pleased with 
> > evolving! Bootstrap upwards! 
> > 
> > Lonnie Courtney Clay 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:38:54 AM UTC-7, the taoist shaman wrote: 
> > 
> > > LIFE       u can't pinpoint life to 1 thing      life is death 
> > > death is life   a non being existing and hidden shows itself and 
> > > becomes a being ,   a being existing is visable and hides itself , and 
> > > becomes a non being      life is an illusion set before us to see if 
> > > we can solve the riddle , but whats more if we can look through the 
> > > illusion and see reality at all times , but whats more , if we can 
> > > live by the way of reality / truth at all times     i like to fight 
> > > for sport , life is a fight cage, i use my opponents aggregations 
> > > against himself and try not to hurt him too bad , and therefore dont 
> > > like to fight, therefore life is not a fight             shaickspeer , 
> > > to him life was a stage and all the people actors        life is a 
> > > test    a game for keeps     a battlefield   it is likened unto water 
> > > which can flow arownd or crash as wave        is the peak of a mountan 
> > > the begining or the end     if u see only light u r blind if u see 
> > > only dark u r blind when the 2 combine u have sight          life is a 
> > > testing grownd and an opportunity      opportunity to evolve ones own 
> > > self     that is what separates us from the animals , we can choose to 
> > > evolve into a higher  being 
> > 
> > > nominal9 wrote: 
> > > > Insanity Screams...? HAR 
> > 
> > > > On Mar 5, 6:59 am, "Serenity Smiles" <[email protected]> 
> > > > wrote: 
> > > > > Now it is my choice, THIS IS MY PLANET, I am demanding my human 
> rights, 
> > > MY 
> > > > > CHOICE, they LIE!!!!!!!!!!! 
> > 
> > > > > -----Original Message----- 
> > > > > From: ornamentalmind 
> > > > > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 4:49 PM 
> > > > > To: Epistemology 
> > > > > Subject: [epistemology 11906] Re: What is life? 
> > 
> > > > > chaz...great to see that you are still here kicking the tires on 
> > > > > beliefs! I came here mainly to see if you were still 
> posting....cool! 
> > 
> > > > > On Jan 20, 5:32 pm, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > > > > > Your statement says nothing about life. It does not capture any 
> > > > > > essential quality in the meaning of the word. 
> > > > > > Your response could capture any event, but has nothing to say as 
> the 
> > > > > > the question. 
> > > > > > I'd love to hear what you think it means. 
> > 
> > > > > > On Dec 24 2010, 10:11 am, Awori <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > 
> > > > > > > In heated discourse about the meaning of nature---I was one 
> time 
> > > asked 
> > > > > > > to define life. This is what I said: "Life is a moment in space 
> and 
> > 
> > > > > > > time". To my disappointment--I got no reaction from the group. 
> Is 
> > > it 
> > > > > > > because I was absurdly wrong? I have continued to use this 
> response 
> > > as 
> > > > > > > my standard explanation of what life is. Has anyone in out 
> there 
> > > given 
> > > > > > > this age old subject a better look? 
> > 
> > > > > > > AA 
> > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > Groups 
> > > > > "Epistemology" group. 
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > > > [email protected]. 
> > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// 
> > > groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - 
> > 
> > - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to