Back Ache, Gas Pains, Acid Indigestion, Loose Bowels, or did you "just get up on the wrong side of the rock"?
http://www.jstor.org/pss/20516110 http://books.google.com/books?id=GQxAAAAAIAAJ&q=t.v.+fleming&dq=t.v.+fleming&hl=en&ei=8pQJTvesHOm30AHs1NF8&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA Foundations of Philosophy was the first book on philosophy which I read, in seventh grade to expand my vocabulary. I am a plagiarist, as I have said elsewhere. Do you give a list of references for everything which you think, citing book title and author? So far as I know, my sole contribution to philosophy is a succinct statement "information alters consciousness" given in 2001, a paraphrase of long winded discourses. On second thought, this one regarding the art of blacksmithing/forging might also be relevant, given in 2007 "When iron spends enough time between the hammer and anvil, it turns to steel." Lonnie Courtney Clay On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:11:39 AM UTC-7, georges wrote: > > > --- On Mon, 6/27/11, Lonnie Clay <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant > I quote"Kant asserts that experience is based both upon the perception of > external objects and a priori knowledge.[30] The external world, he writes, > provides those things which we sense. It is our mind, though, that processes > this information about the world and gives it order, allowing us to > comprehend it. Our mind supplies the conditions of space and time to > experience objects. According to the "transcendental unity of apperception", > the concepts of the mind (Understanding) and the perceptions or intuitions > that garner information from phenomena (Sensibility) are synthesized by > comprehension. Without the concepts, intuitions are nondescript; without the > intuitions, concepts are meaningless—thus the famous statement, "Thoughts > without content are empty, intuitions without concepts are blind."[31] > > "Don't see the connection with what I just wrote? > ============ > Sure I see. I see that > > 1.Wikipedia wisdom is as usually that of a kitchen almanac for village > idiots. > > 2.That "Kant's Epistemology" is a wrong title. It should say > "Lonnie's intimate secrets". > > Georges. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/Y0U549aw6pwJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
