On Oct 28, 4:29 am, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 28, 7:24 am, johnlawrencereedjr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > jr writes> > > While objects of great density do exist they are not the consequence > > of gravity which our notion of such objects is based on. Gravity is > > just a force we feel. Any force we feel can and is overpowered by > > electromagnetism. > > Hi John, > > It sounds like you know something about this. Do you think it can be > said that all forces could be interpreted correctly as subjective > experiences of electromagnetism, ie gravity is just the effect of the > density and scale (are there other factors in 'gravity?' on the > electromagnetic relation between other objects and groups of objects. > Density, rather than generating a gravitational field, just diminishes > the effects of electromagnetism; more like Kryptonite. > > Craig
jr writes> Rather than diminish the effects of electromagnetism the effects are increased to attract all atoms rather than just optimally structured atoms. True its much weaker than the EM we observe, but much stronger in that it acts on all atoms. You are definitrly headed in the right direction. None of us know a damned thing about what is really going on. Keep that idea in your head and it will take you past all the so called knowledgeable. I mean come on: jumping electrons, black holes, big bangs, etc etc ad infinitum. It starts with defining the universe in terms of a force we feel when we act on resistance. The attraction is uniform on non-un iform atoms.. What we feel is inconsequential to anything but living organisms. Have a good time Craig. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
