Just curious over allocation of one electron per human brain. May I make a few enquiries. In my own brain I always think in pairs of opposite directions on any issue and I conclude that the brain contains a dualism of forces that are poles apart and this set of pairs could be two electrons of opposite directions or an electron and a positron. My original PhD topic was on this kind of geometric phenomenon but my supervisor has rejected it so I am now working on the structural approach to arithetic problem solving, so I may not say much about one electron by Pauli exclusion for now. However, one question is: take a baby in the womb for instance. Has it a brain and an electron in it. If yes then we could say that women contain two electrons when pregnant. Or does baby's electron wait just outside to enter into baby as soon as it is born? Do other creatures like ants and maggots have each an electron? Happy Christmas to you all. Mike Atovigba.
On 12/15/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > ============================================================================= > Today's Topic Summary > ============================================================================= > > Group: [email protected] > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics > > - The big picture [1 Update] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/fb950df8b4d1a41c > - Source of Consciousness. [3 Updates] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/dc57f3c57b72fe7b > - Where does the information come from? [2 Updates] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/395ebeb96daacbb6 > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: The big picture > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/fb950df8b4d1a41c > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 1 ---------- > From: archytas <[email protected]> > Date: Dec 15 06:26AM -0800 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/7838f329a710ac68 > > We's send a probe out into apathy Lonnie - but we can't be arsed. > > > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: Source of Consciousness. > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/dc57f3c57b72fe7b > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 3 ---------- > From: sadovnik socratus <[email protected]> > Date: Dec 14 08:40PM -0800 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/35363767f80cc3d7 > > Source of Consciousness. > Will Physics explain Consciousness? > =. > Does evolution begin on big bang level? > Does evolution begin on the quarks level? > In our earthly world there is only one fundamental > particle - electron > Does evolution begin on the electron’s level? > Can an electron evolve? > Does an electron have consciousness ? > At first glance this seems to be a rather senseless questions. > But . . . . . > Energy is electromagnetic waves (em). > In 1904 Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron > It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron > The electron and the em waves they are physical reality > Can evolution of life begin on electron’s level? > We say: Molecular biology & molecular evolution, > Cosmology & cosmic evolution. > If Universe evolve can electron evolve too ? > Does evolution of life begin on electron level ? > Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe > Electron takes important part in this work > Question: > Why does the simplest particle - electron have six ( 6 ) formulas: > E=h*f, e = +ah*c, e = -ah*c, +E=Mc^2, -E=Mc^2, E= ∞ ? > Nobody knows > Question: > Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ? > a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass > b) Maxwell’s equations > c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law > d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law > e) Fermi-Dirac statistics > Nobody knows. > ====. > Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations: > > "One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae > have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own, > that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers, > that we get more out of them than was originally put into them." > ====. > Ladies and Gentlemen ! > Friends ! > Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe, he is wiser than we > are. > ==========. > Once again: Brain and Electron. > Human brain works on two levels: > consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain > create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and > subconsciousness from physical point of view ( interaction > between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean > that the state of neurons in these two situations is different. > How can we understand these different states of neurons? > How does the brain generate consciousness? > We can understand this situation only on the quantum level, > only using Quantum theory. But there isn’t QT without > Quantum of Light and Electron. So, what is interaction between > Quantum of Light, Electron and brain ? Nobody knows. > Therefore I say: > we must understand not only the brain but electron too. > And when we understand the Electron > we will know the Ultimate Nature of Reality. > =================. > According to Pauli Exclusion Principle > only one single electron can be in the atom. > If the atom contains more than one electron > (for example - two), this atom represents " Siamese twins". > Save us, the Great God, of having such atoms, such cells. > And therefore the human brain has only one Electron. > Each of us has an Electron, but we do not know it. > As the ‘Bhagavad Gita’ says: > Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. > They do not know My transcendental nature and > My supreme dominion over all that be. > / Chapter 9. Text 11./ > # > Where is the root of consciousness? > At what step does consciousness begin? > The consciousness begins on electron’s level. > An electron (quantum of light) has its own initial consciousness. > This consciousness is not rigid, but can develop. > The development of consciousness goes > “from vague wish up to a clear thought” / Veda./ > ================== . > Best wishes > Israel Sadovnik Socratus > ==================. > > > ---------- 2 of 3 ---------- > From: sadovnik socratus <[email protected]> > Date: Dec 15 04:23AM -0800 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/d1a9438a27a80c0 > > Could hackers develop a 'computer virus' to infect the human mind? > > Synthetic biology is 'out-accelerating evolution' - expert > Bio-crime today is 'like computer crime in the Eighties' > Viruses could be used to influence behaviour - and we > may have to 'learn how to counterattack' > 'One of the most powerful technologies in the world' > > By Rob Waugh > Last updated at 9:26 AM on 14th December 2011 > > The field of 'synthetic biology' is in its infancy. > We can 'tweak' the genetics of life forms - but billionaire > entrepreneur Craig Venter only created 'artificial life' for the > first time last year, christening his life form 'Synthia'. > But experts working within the field believe that our expertise > is out-accelerating natural evolution by a factor of millions > of years - and some warn that synthetic biology could spin out of > control. > It could lead, says Andrew Hessel of Singularity University, > on Nasa's research campus, to a world where hackers could engineer > viruses or bacteria to control human minds. > Hessel believes that genetic engineering is the next frontier of > computing. > 'This is one of the most powerful technologies in the world,' > says Hessel 'Synthetic biology - the writing of life.' > 'I advocate that cells are living computers and DNA is a > programming language.' > 'I want to see life programmed and used to solve global challenges > so that humanity can achieve a sustainable relationship within > the biosphere,' he says.It's growing fast. It will grow faster than > computer technologies.' > He predicts a world where we can 'print' DNA, and even 'decode' it. > But he warned, in a speech at technology conference TXM, > that viruses and bacteria send chemicals into human brains – and > could be used to influence, or even 'control' their host. > > A literal virus - injected into a 'host' in the guise of a vaccine, > say - could be used to control behaviour. > Hessel warns that we 'may have to learn how to counterattack' > against such weapons. > > Security expert Marc Goodman said, 'Synthetic biology will lead > to new forms of bioterrorism,' and said, 'Bio-crime today is akin > to computer crime in the early Eighties, Few initially recognised > the problem - but it grew exponentially.' > When billionaire entrepreneur Craig Venter 'created life' last year > by adding synthetic DNA to a bacteria cell, Professor > Julian Savulescu, an Oxford University ethicist, said: > 'Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity's > history, potentially peeking into its destiny.This could be used > in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. > The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm.' > Hessel, however, is generally optimistic about the future of synthetic > biology. The scientist - who had a vasectomy because he > 'never trusted the process' of natural reproduction, says, > 'We are going to make synthetic genomes - human genomes. > It will make cloning look organic. It will make human reproduction > look quaint.' > Computer World blogger Darlene Storm says, 'I know people who > can't even keep their computers protected, updated and patched – > I wonder if they would be more security minded when the > hacking could be lethal?' > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2073936/Could-hackers-develop-virus-infect-human-mind.html > > Comments (20) > # > Isn't man fantastic, is their no end to man's creation and > manipulation > of the universe. Has he succeeded in becoming like God, > in both creation of the universe from the humble beginnings > of eating the forbidden fruit to this, the ultimate pinnacle > of man's control over the cells, virus and programming of DNA, > isn't it just amazing, we have become like the gods. > - Man, World, 14/12/2011 20:26 > # > . . . > > > ---------- 3 of 3 ---------- > From: awori achoka <[email protected]> > Date: Dec 15 04:39AM -0800 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/563caddc37341ecf > > Wouldn't be the first time for such experimentation with fate..it usually > hits back so fast, we have to scramble for an antidote. The first such > human will kill the experimental hacker. I like the idea though. > > > > > > Strategic visioning and futures. > > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: Where does the information come from? > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/395ebeb96daacbb6 > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 2 ---------- > From: sadovnik socratus <[email protected]> > Date: Dec 14 08:39PM -0800 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/762d1238fab0bd6d > > Correction: > Information is a result of the conscious --- > it is an after fact noted by the brain --- > after receipt of electrical signals from electron. > ( Brain changes its state / program of neuron energy > structure after receipt of electrical signals from electron.) > ==. > > > > ---------- 2 of 2 ---------- > From: awori achoka <[email protected]> > Date: Dec 14 09:10PM -0800 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/435c47bdd2a7ce9a > > You are a good teacher. Yes, that looks plausible. > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
