If life systems are in constant photonic communication, it implies that all life is intelligence. On Feb 8, 2012 5:44 PM, "archytas" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Twaddle. > > On Feb 2, 4:25 am, JacobSmith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Intelligent Design and the Fallacy of Annihilation. > > > > The scientific method is reinforced by using "intelligent design". > > The Santorum Amendment "promoted the teaching of > > intelligent design while questioning the academic standing > > of evolution in U.S. public schools." > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santorum_Amendment > > > > In fact, intelligent design is the result of all true investigations; > > theories presented and subsequent orderly facts displayed. > > The teaching of evolution as "fact", lessens the process of > > academic rigor, within every facet of science curricula. The > > process of evolution is not presented with record credibility; > > i.e., the evidence offered is hinged upon the unproven theory, > > instead of the records of observations obtained being the > > initiating force behind the theoretical postulations offered. > > > > Since the records of observations cannot be obtained by > > scientists, due to lack of testing instrumentality; (i.e., for > > example, no instruments on earth can endure the possibility > > of being placed upon the surface of the Sun and function). > > Science is not science when it theorizes into the infinite; > > assuming it can declare authoritatively what is and is not, > > when there is absolutely no possibility it can functionally > > measure it. Evolution, the Big Bang Theory, etc., are NIL > > on academic rigor. Eternal intelligence is an ordered universe. > > > > Clearly defined, the conjunction of Evolution and Big Bang Theory > > is nothing more or less than a new distortion in medieval Astrology. > > which "consists of a number of belief systems which hold that > > there is a relationship between astronomical phenomena > > and events in the human world.". . . ."it is a pseudoscience > > because it makes little attempt to develop solutions to its problems, > > [when there is absolutely no possibility it can functionally measure > > it.] > > shows no concern for the evaluation of competing theories, > > and is selective in considering confirmations and dis-confirmations." > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Banghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology > > > > All man made materials are limited by a physical > > time differential that does not exceed the depth of > > the periods of time under consideration. The fact > > that all evaluations are made by physical properties > > that are subject to the laws of physics, makes each > > evaluation resource limited by the measuring > > device itself, which is subject to radioactive > > decay. Age calculating all instruments and placing > > them within their sphere as to time, relative to > > radioactive decay, means that they are each > > restricted to a measuring capacity, related > > to their own decay process. > > > > No material instrument exists that spans back > > to the time of the origins of the Universe. > > Therefore, the beginnings of time cannot be > > evaluated and any sequence of events proposed > > cannot be valid by itself, unless it undertakes > > the comprehension of the immediate whole > > of the known and unknown Universe. This > > is a very real impossibility within the framework > > of the finite, mortal human mind, for it is noted > > homo sapiens indeed are also subject to death, > > as well as other related human imperfections. > > > > Evolutionary "theory" transcends many periods of time, > > engineered with "just guessing" adjustments which > > result in mixed conclusions. This "Evolutionary GPS" > > is not able to send out correct directional signals, > > by any trilateration of events in a five-dimensional space. > > "Many spacetime continua have physical interpretations > > which most physicists would consider bizarre or unsettling. > > For example, a compact spacetime has closed timelike > > curves, which violate our usual ideas of causality (that is, > > future events could affect past ones)." "For us believing > > physicists, the distinction between past, present, and future > > is only an illusion, even if a stubborn one." --Albert Einstein. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime > > > > "Evolutionary GPS" is derived from the black hole > > information paradox, which suggests "that physical > > information could disappear in a black hole, allowing > > many physical states to evolve into the same state." > > In other words, "the universe is largely chaotic", > > because information conservation is not preserved > > within the quantum realm. The concept is covered in > > biology as DNA mutation, at the genetic level, as > > [all current species being descended from a single > > common ancestor, ] > > > > The very foundations of evolution as presented from > > Darwin, forward and backwards in time, are a cause > > of great contention, since in very principle, their > > assertions violate the physics principle wherein any > > complete information about a physical system at one > > point in time, should determine its state at any other > > time, as found in its wave function, from the standpoint > > of quantum mechanics. The Big Bang and related > > theories project the same error, such as the Big Rip, > > or "the ultimate fate of the universe, in which the > > matter of the universe, from stars and galaxies to > > atoms and subatomic particles, is progressively > > torn apart by the expansion of the universe at > > a certain time in the future." > > > > This is completely contradicted within quantum wave level > > integrated metabolic processes, of all cells and organisms. > > (1) Biophotons are weak emissions of light radiated > > from the cells of all living things. A photon is a single > > particle of light. Plants, animals and humans generate > > up to 100 photons per second, per .15 square inches > > (1 sq. centimeter) of surface area. The light is too faint > > to be seen by the naked eye, but biophotons have > > been detected and verified using photomultiplier tubes. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biophoton > > > > According to a leading researcher of biophotons, > > German biophysicist Fritz-Albert Popp, light is > > constantly being absorbed and remitted by DNA > > molecules within each cell's nucleus. These > > biophotons create a dynamic, coherent web of light. > > A system that could be responsible for chemical > > reactions within the cells, cellular communication > > throughout the organism, and the overall regulation > > of the biological system, including embryonic > > development into a predetermined form. > http://www.wisegeek.com/what-are-biophotons.htm > > > > (2) Are humans really beings of light? OR: > > Is DNA the next Internet? > > . . . > > "Veljkovic and Cosic proposed that molecular > > interactions are electrical in nature, and they > > take place over distances that are large compared > > with the size of molecules. Cosic later introduced > > the idea of dynamic electromagnetic field interactions, > > that molecules recognize their particular targets > > and vice versa by electromagnetic resonance. > > In other words, the molecules send out specific > > frequencies of electromagnetic waves which not > > only enable them to 'see' and 'hear' each other, > > as both photon and phonon modes exist for > > electromagnetic waves, but also to influence > > each other at a distance and become ineluctably > > drawn to each other if vibrating out of phase > > (in a complementary way)." -- > > The Real Bioinformatics Revolution: > > Proteins and Nucleic Acids Singing to One Another? > > . . . > > "There are about 100,000 chemical reactions > > happening in every cell each second. The chemical > > reaction can only happen if the molecule which > > is reacting is excited by a photon... Once the photon > > has excited a reaction it returns to the field and is > > available for more reactions... We are swimming > > in an ocean of light."http://www.viewzone.com/dnax.html > > > > (3) APS >> Journals >> Rev. Mod. Phys > > . >> Volume 75 >> Issue 2 > > Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559-606 (2003) > > The cosmological constant and dark energy > > "Physics welcomes the idea that space contains > > energy whose gravitational effect approximates > > that of Einstein's cosmological constant, Ë; > > today the concept is termed dark energy > > or quintessence."http://rmp.aps.org/abstract/RMP/v75/i2/p559_1 > > > > (4) Biophotons are weak emissions of light radiated > > from the cells of all living things, which together, in > > the total Universe, communicate "energy whose > > gravitational effect approximates that of Einstein's > > cosmological constant, Ë"; i.e., the "quintessence." > > [Divine energy, power, or influence that proceeds > > from God through Christ and gives life and light > > to all things. It is the law by which all things are > > governed in heaven and on earth. > > Doctrine & Covenants 88:6-13] > http://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/88.6-13?lang=eng#5 > > > > (5) A sub set of this process is found in the modern > > technology found in cloud computing, which describes > > all data that is floating around in Internet space. In like > > manner, biophotons throughout the whole of the Universe, > > create a dynamic, coherent web of interconnected light. > > > > (6) Thus, essentially and truthfully, Evolution and > > Big Bang are conceptually, statements of a belief > > in annihilation, as [defined as "total destruction" > > or "complete obliteration" of an object.] This could > > only occur if it were possible to create, or in the > > Universe, there was a vacuum state. Conversely, > > it has been suggested, that even for matter that > > falls into a black hole, "information gets imprinted, > > forever and ever, onto the surface of that black hole's > > event horizon". Therefore, in principle, evolution > > is an invalid theory and the Big Bang hypothesis > > fails miserably, in replicating or copying the > > messages found in the elements and in life forms. > http://max1.hosteur.com/~laserp/anglais/gariaev.pdf > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
