On Apr 5, 6:55 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > I feel Nom is on firmer ground here than Awori - we do know something > of the neutrino, including varieties, varying oscillation and so on.
Neutrinos began as an idea of Wolfgang Paul in 1930: "because of the "wrong" statistics of the N and Li6 nuclei and the continuous beta spectrum, I have hit upon a deseperate remedy to save the "exchange theorem" of statistics and the law of conservation of energy" http://lappweb.in2p3.fr/neutrinos/aplettre.html http://lappweb.in2p3.fr/neutrinos/anhistory.html Subsequent measurements and observations were roughly adapted to fit this solution. The observations are correct, but the interpretation may be completely inside out. Neutrinos have been around for only 80 years. Ptolemaic epicycle was accepted science for 1000 years before Copernican models superseded it. I think that the entire Standard Model will eventually have to be superseded by an intersubjective model. Quantum events are not particles or waves in space - they are the existential shadows through time of primitive sensations. Craig > I know enough on the laws of electromagnetism to have called my dog > after Clerk Maxwell, but can't dance worth shit, somewhat evidencing > Nom's point. > > On Apr 3, 6:38 pm, awori achoka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes, indeed...and what are we humble earthlings supposed to do about it? I > > mean Who knows about the Neutrino, other than itself? > > On Apr 3, 2012 7:07 PM, "nominal9" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Time to get over it, I think... > > > What seems to apply in one context... > > > by analogy > > > has a very slim "chance" of applying in another context... > > > > for example > > > > I know little to crap about the laws of electromagnetism... for > > > instance..... > > > > but I am reasonably certain that the said laws would not do much at all in > > > aiding me to dance jig.... > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Epistemology" group. > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/z4YGG_jeuuAJ. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
