If quarks have square of c as speed, then automatically there is a higher than light speed except that light speed c is used as reference point. Thus sq. of c > c. Mike Atovigba
On 4/13/12, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > ============================================================================= > Today's Topic Summary > ============================================================================= > > Group: [email protected] > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics > > - Occam's Razor and the Special Theory of Relativity. [3 Updates] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/e4d05260ccaced61 > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: Occam's Razor and the Special Theory of Relativity. > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/e4d05260ccaced61 > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 3 ---------- > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Apr 12 09:59AM -0700 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/1fbd4e99912296ef > > Occam's Razor and the Special Theory of Relativity. > 1. > In 1905 Einstein wrote the paper: > “ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies.” ( SRT). > He wrote about moving of ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ (!) > It means he wrote about particles like quantum of light, electron. (!) > And this movement is going in a negative 4D continuum. > 2. > One postulate of SRT says: the speed of quantum > of light in a vacuum is a constant ( c=1). > 3 > Another postulate of SRT says that motion, every motion (!), > (even including the motion of quantum of light ) is relative. (!) > 4. > One postulate of SRT says the speed of quantum > of light is going in a vacuum. > Minkowski, trying to understand Einstein’s idea, decided to take > time as a fourth coordinate and created his negative spacetime > 4D continuum. > What is negative 4D spacetime continuum really? > Really the negative spacetime 4D continuum is vacuum. > Why? > Because only vacuum has negative parameter ( negative temperature ) > and only in vacuum the space and time tied together in unrequited > continuum. > ===. > My conclusion. > Einstein’s SRT explains the behavior of light quanta in vacuum. > =====. > Best wishes. > Israel Sadovnik. Socratus > =========================.. > P.S. > "Einstein's special theory of relativity is based on two postulates: > One is the relativity of motion, and the second is the constancy > and universality of the speed of light. > Could the first postulate be true and the other false? > If that was not possible, Einstein would not have had to make two > postulates. But I don't think many people realized until recently > that you could have a consistent theory in which you changed only > the second postulate." > / Lee Smolin, The Trouble With Physics, p. 226. / > > ===. > > > ---------- 2 of 3 ---------- > From: archytas <[email protected]> > Date: Apr 12 05:00PM -0700 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/9fa0bdb9be35fcd > > From common sense (which will never do), I have trouble with light not > needing acceleration to be at its speed in vacuum. > > On Apr 12, 5:59 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > ---------- 3 of 3 ---------- > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Apr 12 08:36PM -0700 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/1632e794ac5e9eb9 > > The question is: > Can quantum of light change its constant speed ? > ===. > Faster-than-light. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light > > etc . . . > ===. > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
