Since what we feel as gravitational Force [mg] may also be quantitatively defined as [ma] where mass is derived and conserved and [g] is an independent property of location, we think that the entire universe can be explained in terms of what we feel. We think that we have "proved" that what we feel and call "gravity" [mg], is the cause of the celestial universe motion. So that the changing magnitudes for [g] external to the balance scale are a consequence of what we feel [mg] rather than what we feel [mg] being a consequence of our location in space. To rephrase it: We think that the changing magnitudes for [g] are a consequence of gravity (what we feel) rather than gravity (what we feel) being a consequence of our location in space. It should be clear that the changing magnitudes for [g] are not a consequence of what we feel and so not a consequence of gravity. Current web address: http://groups.google.com/group/thejohnreed
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
