Hi, > Ah, we are getting somewhere... :)
What was your first clue? :-p > > ... does sourceforge provide these features yet? > No, not as much as I'ld like. You will just love GitHub. > What's the issue with the backmerge? Loosing the committer id? Yes. > It's not generated content on Windows. ;) Nor is it handwritten. This is confusing... ?-) > Maybe, but would require the developers to install the additional > tools. My philosophy is that Equalizer should be easy to set up and > compile, in order to lower the entry barrier. I *hate* when I'm > downloading some OSS to hunt dependencies for hours just to get it to > compile, usually I just drop the stuff if it takes more than 30 minutes. So do I. But integrated dependancies are sometimes even worse: Imagine downloading some OSS library that has libExample version 0.8.15 integrated which comflicts with the version 1.0 that you are already using in your program... The best solution of course is to keep dependancies at a minimum. However, CMake should be an acceptable tool-dependancy while Boost should be an acceptable library-dependancy. > Right now we have a small perl script to convert the .glsl into an > includable header, and links/lynx to generate the RELNOTES from the > html source. I guess for the former there are easy alternatives, and > for the latter it doesn't matter much. I'm open for ideas. :) Surely CMake can stringify the .glsl files. Not sure how best to handle the RELNOTES. Are the html sources handwritten? Maybe rst would be an alternative. > What's the benefit of QuickBook? On a quick glance it seems to me that > it would be a better fit for the 'website' files. I thougt about putting the Guide on a Website. If you grant me the permission. > > Automatic regession testing (AKA CI) > I'ld love that, but don't have the time to do so. Me neither. Hence, I assigned it a rather low priority. But let's keep that in mind. > 1) Reducing the size of the existing test images so that the tests > always run > 2) Provide an additional, extended test set for 'power users' and > plugin developers? Love the idea. cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ eq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.equalizergraphics.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eq-dev http://www.equalizergraphics.com
