On 26. Aug 2010, at 16:54, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
I would prefer solution 2, but this would break backward
compatibility
on MSVC...
I am strong for consistency, so I would prefer option 2 too.
Agreed.
This however leads to two further questions:
1. name it 'Equalizer' and break backward compatibility on unix.
2. name it 'eq' and break backward compatibility on Windows.
I would opt for 1. Having a library called 'eq' for a project called
'Equalizer' is counterintuitive IMHO.
Agreed: libEqualizer.so and libEqualizerServer.so it is.
Cheers,
Stefan.
_______________________________________________
eq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.equalizergraphics.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eq-dev
http://www.equalizergraphics.com
