Hi Alex, My personal opinion also is that IP is a horible name but maybe as BJ propose we can use long bundle symbolic name?
-Pavlin AB> I'm glad I'm not alone. I've asked the question to a wider audience to AB> see if they'd get the reference: AB> http://www.eclipsezone.com/eclipse/forums/t98469.html AB> On 07/07/07, Remy Chi Jian Suen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You're not alone, Alex. I think ip is a horrible name. >> initprovisioning or initprov or something would've been better. >> There's just no way that someone's going to know that 'ip' is 'initial >> provisioning'. >> >> Regards, >> Rem >> >> On 7/7/07, Alex Blewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Am I really the only one who thinks '.ip' is a bad name? >> > >> > Alex. >> > >> > On 07/07/07, Simon Kaegi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > That's great! I've just done a quick sanity check and everything >> > > compiles, >> > > starts and is ready to try out. >> > > Thanks. >> > > >> > > For anyone wanting to take a look, the following new projects were added >> > > to >> > > the incubator. >> > > >> > > 1) org.eclipse.equinox.ds >> > > 2) org.eclipse.equinox.io >> > > 3) org.eclipse.equinox.ip >> > > 4) org.eclipse.equinox.util >> > > 5) org.eclipse.equinox.wireadmin >> > > >> > > I had one cosmetic question for equinox.util. Currently the BSN is >> > > "org.eclipse.equinox.util.putifull" -- is there some reason it's not just >> > > org.eclipse.equinox.util? >> > > -Simon >> > > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/07/2007 06:41:23 AM: >> > > >> > > > In CVS under your proposed naming. >> > > > >> > > > -Pavlin >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > OK, I'm not particular about the names right now. Since we already >> > > > have a DS bundle lets just use org.eclipse.equinox.ds for >> > > > declarative services. >> > > > >> > > > I also like org.eclipse.equinox.ip for initial provisioning but >> > > > thought it might be to short :) but it is snappy. >> > > > >> > > > Pavlin, if these are ok with you please release with the names org. >> > > > eclipse.equinox.ds and org.eclipse.equinox.ip. As I said before it >> > > > is no big deal to rename the bundles if needed in the incubator later. >> > > > >> > > > Tom >> > > > >> > > > Chris Aniszczyk/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > 07/05/2007 09:34 PM >> > > > >> > > > Please respond to >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> >> > > > >> > > > To >> > > > >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> >> > > > >> > > > cc >> > > > >> > > > Subject >> > > > >> > > > Re: [equinox-dev] Prosyst contributions >> > > > >> > > > as an outsider, +1 for DS instead of SCR, there's like 5 people that >> > > > would get the SCR reference :) >> > > > >> > > > initialprovisioning is really long.... >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > >> > > > --- >> > > > Chris Aniszczyk | IBM Lotus | Eclipse Committer | http://mea-bloga. >> > > > blogspot.com | +1.860.839.2465 >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] Jeff McAffer ---07/05/2007 09:13:02 PM---I agree >> > > > with all/most Tom said. In the end we should look to have just one >> > > > DS implementation, Ultimately I suggest that it be >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > From: >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > To: >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > Date: >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > 07/05/2007 09:13 PM >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > Subject: >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > Re: [equinox-dev] Prosyst contributions >> > > > >> > > > I agree with all/most Tom said. In the end we should look to have >> > > > just one DS implementation, Ultimately I suggest that it be called >> > > > o.e.e.ds. Never did like "scr". I'm a little bummed by o.e.e. >> > > > initialprovisioning. o.e.e.ip is snappier and I doubt that anyone >> > > > would get confused with Intelectual property, or Internet Protocol >> > > > or, ... In any event, it is a mild dislike so... >> > > > >> > > > Lets get the code in the incubator and move forward. >> > > > >> > > > Jeff >> > > > >> > > > Thomas Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > 07/05/2007 03:51 PM >> > > > >> > > > Please respond to >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> >> > > > >> > > > To >> > > > >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> >> > > > >> > > > cc >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > >> > > > Subject >> > > > >> > > > Re: [equinox-dev] Prosyst contributions >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > >> > > > [image removed] >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Simon, >> > > > > >> > > > > I can commit the sources in the CVS. Here are the open issues >> > > > > that should be resolved prior moving code to the CVS. >> > > > > >> > > > > 1. Naming. >> > > > > Following the discussion the last proposed naming is: >> > > > > 1.1 org.eclipse.equionx.initialprovisioning >> > > > > other suggestion: org.eclipse.equionx.ip >> > > > >> > > > +1 for org.eclipse.equinox.initialprovisioning >> > > > >> > > > I think this name will reduce an confusion with the >> > > > rest of the equinox provisioning work. >> > > > >> > > > > 1.2 org.eclipse.equionx.ds >> > > > > other suggestion: org.eclipse.equionx.scr >> > > > >> > > > +1 for org.eclipse.equinox.scr >> > > > >> > > > > 1.3 org.eclipse.equinox.io >> > > > > 1.4 org.eclipse.equinox.util >> > > > > 1.5 org.eclipse.equinox.wireadmin >> > > > > >> > > > > 2. Replacing. If we use the names org.eclipse.equinox.wireadmin and >> > > > > org.eclipse.equionx.ds they collide with the current one. Can we >> > > replace >> > > > > the code in the CVS at this stage directly or temporary other names >> > > > > will be used? >> > > > >> > > > There is no problem replacing the current implementations in the >> > > > incubator. To be clear this is under the equinox-incubator directory >> > > > at dev.eclipse.org:/cvsroot/eclipse. At this point I suggest we >> > > > get the initial code released in the incubator. It is likely that >> > > > a number of refactorings are going be needed to follow other >> > > > eclipse coding practices (i.e. using "internal" package names etc.). >> > > > >> > > > I'm not fussed on getting all the names correct initially. We >> > > > can easily rename them if needed in the incubator. >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > 3. javax.microedition.io package >> > > > > Now it is in Connector services implementation. This is not a good >> > > > > choice because it is needed only on Java SE VMs. J2ME VMs >> > > > > contains that package. In our equinox distribution it is a fragment >> > > > > of >> > > > > the system bundle that is installed only on Java SE VMs. >> > > > > But initially we can put it inside the connector implementation. >> > > > > >> > > > > -Pavlin >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > I think we should consider separating this out into another bundle and >> > > > import the packages from org.eclipse.equinox.io (but we can do this >> > > later). >> > > > I'm not sure why it has to be a system bundle fragment. I think we >> > > should >> > > > make it a normal bundle (called javax.microedition.io?). >> > > > >> > > > Tom _______________________________________________ >> > > > equinox-dev mailing list >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > equinox-dev mailing list >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > equinox-dev mailing list >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev >> > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > equinox-dev mailing list >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > equinox-dev mailing list >> > > [email protected] >> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > equinox-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> equinox-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev >> AB> _______________________________________________ AB> equinox-dev mailing list AB> [email protected] AB> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
