+1. This is release-hardened code, and deserves graduation. It is in wide 
production use today in Eclipse 3.3, and in the eclipse.org jar signing 
infrastructure. It needs a bit of cleanup (such as javadoc for its API), 
but there is plenty of time for that in the 3.4 release cycle.





Jeff McAffer/Ottawa/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/09/2007 11:05 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org>


To
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc

Subject
[equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle







As you may know, we used to have the JARProcessor embedded in the bowels 
of Update manager.  Turns out that there are several uses for the 
processor (pack200 support, signing, verifying, ...) and having this 
function as a stand-alone bundle would be "a good thing"(tm).  So in the 
p2 work we did just that and created org.eclipse.equinox.p2.jarprocessor. 
Bug 
        https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=198564   
talks about updating update to use the new processor.  Of course, the 
current JarProcessor bundle is in the Equinox Incubator.  To date I think 
we have avoided cases where we build the mainstream SDK based on content 
from an incubator. 

We have two choices, we can wait to move Update over or we can graduate 
the current JARProcessor bundle.  Here I popose the latter since the code 
in the bundle is unchanged from the original that shipped in 3.3.  All we 
are doing is putting it in a separate bundle. The only thing at issue is 
the shape of the API and that can evolve until the API freeze just as any 
other bundle in HEAD. 

So consider this a formal call for voting on graduating the 
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.jarprocessor bundle. 
+1 from me. 

Jeff _______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

Reply via email to