I agree, we certainly should use Import-Package. And, from what I understand, Scott is correct, the intention is to have Foundation 1.1 as a minimum execution environment for those bundles.
>From a practical side, I just tried J9 (http://wiki.eclipse.org/J9) and from a quick glance things like javax.security.auth.Subject are, indeed, not present there. I think we'll need to find at least one Foundation 1.1 VM that has those packages (or can accept them as a separate download?) to claim 1.1 as a minimum execution environment. Thanks, Oleg Thomas Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/2007 09:28 AM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> To Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> cc Subject Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security Both John and Rem are correct. Bundles which want to run on a smaller EE than J2SE-1.4 and have access to the javax.security.auth packages should use import-package (e.g. Import-Package: javax.security.auth). You should not make J2SE-1.4 your required EE only because other bundles you depend on use the EE. Equinox is a broad community. A large number of our bundles do run on Foundation 1.1/1.0 (and even down to the minimum OSGi EE). But there are some extra features which require higher EEs. Currently parts of the security work in the incubator can only run on J2SE-1.4 or higher. For example, the core extension bundles (org.eclipse.equinox.security.boot.jre14x or org.eclipse.equinox.security.boot.jre15x) are installed into the extension classloader of the VM. This is required because we need to make the our security provider available to the VM and it will only search for providers on the boot classpath or the extension class loader. Unfortunately at that level the code will only have access to classes that are provided by the EE. They do not have the option to import additional packages which may come from other bundles installed in a Framework running on Foundation 1.1 EE. I opened a couple of bugs against the security bundles. All Equinox bundles should use Import-Package to access packages outside the java.* namespace. We could also split some of the bundles to allow parts of it to run on a Foundation EE. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=208399 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=208400 Tom John Arthorne ---10/31/2007 09:30:11 PM---I think the right approach is to set your bundle's EE to reflect the EE dependencies of *your* bundle, and not the bundles you From: John Arthorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> Date: 10/31/2007 09:30 PM Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security I think the right approach is to set your bundle's EE to reflect the EE dependencies of *your* bundle, and not the bundles you depend on. I.e., if your bundle doesn't directly depend on 1.4, you could still specify an EE of Foundation 1.1 for your bundle. If it turns out that the JAAS bundle requires 1.4, then your bundle will transitively fail to resolve anyway. That way you're not building assumptions into your bundle about the EE of downstream bundles that may change in the future. John Scott Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/31/2007 05:53 PM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> To Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> cc Subject [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security Hi Folks, Some questions: I thought I understood (from Equinox Summit) that the recently approved minimum EE for Equinox 3.4 (Ganymede) was CDC 1.1/Foundation 1.1. I see from looking at the equinox JAAS integration bundles (e.g. org.eclipse.equinox.security.auth) that the runtime environment minimum for those bundles is set to JRE 1.4. I understand this, as the JAAS work depends upon packages like javax.security.auth, and javax.security.auth.login, etc. which do not seem to be in CDC 1.1/Foundation 1.1. So maybe I just answered my own question: it seems that the JAAS security bundles/plugins must assume JRE 1.4 (and can't/won't run on CDC 1.1/Foundation 1.1). So the implicit (to me anyway) idea here is that bundles that use/extend/depend upon the JAAS security integration also obviously must assume JRE 1.4 and not just CDC 1.1. Correct? Scott _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
