Ciao Guys :) Got a problem understanding something, please bear with me for not getting the picture. Following scenario: - Group the IUs by category - Install an IU (not the category)
In this case the Profile will have lost the information about what category the IU was in, right? (Since the IU does not contain the category it belonged to as a property) The only way to retain the category info would be to also install the category which is quite doable since it is an IU itself, however, since the relationship IU<->Category is defined using requires statements all IUs in that category will automatically be installed as well which is not what the user wants in my case. Reason for me asking this is cause I'm thinking about layers of Groups and the same questions surfaces there. Another way of defining such hierarchies would be to store these relations in properites directly within the IUs, however, that basically means bypassing p2 and dependencies at all. A solution here could be to define such category<>IU relations as optional and at the same time install the category along with the IU. However, that might not make sense for you guys.... One minor thing about todays HEAD: org.eclipse.equinox.internal.provisional.p2.engine.phases.Messages has an incorrect BUNDLE_NAME, this one is missing a "provisional"... So long! :) Thanks, Helmut _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
