Thanks John. We'll discuss this amongst the EPP team and see where to go. We have much of the installer generation code working now and the UI is underway. Obviously there is lots of testing and little items to work though
Jeff From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Arthorne Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 7:01 AM To: Equinox development mailing list Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] RE: [eclipse-dev] Re: Eclipse 3.4 shape There is no deep technical problem with the installer - we intend to continue producing it and work on improving it. This decision was really about whether we can get the necessary level of polish and testing to commit to promoting the installer as a "first class" way for the larger community to get Eclipse applications in the Ganymede release. There are various details to work out, and likely more will come up under wider testing. Prioritizing installer work against p2 capabilities exposed to end users in the platform, and p2 build and tooling support, the installer comes up less important. We'll get it in the best shape we can for 3.4, and it will be great to have the EPP team looking into the details of creating installers for EPP packages, since this is where bundle pooling across applications really comes into play. "Jeff McAffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/2008 11:38 AM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> To "'General development mailing list of the Eclipse project.'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc "'Equinox development mailing list'" <[email protected]> Subject [equinox-dev] RE: [eclipse-dev] Re: Eclipse 3.4 shape I think the EPP team is interested in doing this. Do you see any technical reasons why it cannot be done or is this mainly a coordination/timing issue? Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:eclipse-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pascal Rapicault > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [eclipse-dev] Re: Eclipse 3.4 shape > > > Given the load of work that the p2 team is facing, it has been decided > to > not promote the p2-based installer as a delivery format for 3.4.0 (we > may > make it early-access). > However we will try to deliver it for 3.4.1 and get the EPP packages > converted as well. > > PaScaL > > (initial discussion: > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse-dev/msg08091.html) > > _______________________________________________ > eclipse-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
