Will this spawn a new p2 newsgroup too or should all "non-dev" questions continue to funnel into eclipse.technology.equinox?
Remy On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:23 AM, John Arthorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > I would read both anyway so it makes no difference to me. But since there is > clearly a demand for the separation, I don't see why not. > > John > > > > "Haigermoser, Helmut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 07/07/2008 06:36 AM > > Please respond to > Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org> > To > "Equinox development mailing list" <equinox-dev@eclipse.org> > cc > Subject > RE: [equinox-dev] Time for a p2 list? > > > > > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug > Sent: 06 July 2008 17:47 > To: Equinox development mailing list > Subject: [equinox-dev] Time for a p2 list? > > Hey guys, > > I'm seeing a solid amount of traffic for each of the OSGi and p2 > interests on this list. I care less about OSGi and care a lot about p2. > I've started filtering by hand but I'm afraid of missing p2 messages. Is > it time to start a p2-dev list? > > Cheers, > Doug. > _______________________________________________ > equinox-dev mailing list > equinox-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > equinox-dev mailing list > equinox-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev > > _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev