On 2/22/11 12:19, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 2/22/11 12:12, Thomas Watson wrote:
No, package admin may not be available on all future framework implementations of R4.3. I have no plans to remove it from equinox because I know it is used by many clients and I don't want to break them. I would hope that most framework implementations would have the same concern and will keep an implementation of PackageAdmin around for a long time.

I'm not sure I understand the seriousness of this "breaking change" though. There is an alternative way of doing this as BJ suggests. Also, PackageAdmin may have been a mandatory core service in OSGi R4.2 specification, but it has not always been so. Previous releases of the core specifications made the PackageAdmin service optional. Although I don't think there is any reasonable core framework implementation available that does not provide PackageAdmin at the moment.

I guess I didn't even remember making them mandatory...the R4.2 spec still has sentences like this:

"For example, a Framework vendor could supply the
optional services like Permission Admin service and Start Level service with
Framework extension bundles."

Sorry, I read "Permission Admin" as "Package Admin", but I'm still trying to see in the spec where it says Package Admin is mandatory. See this in 7.1.3:

"The Framework’s system bundle should provide a Package Admin service
for the Management Agent."

-> richard


-> richard


Tom

[email protected] wrote: -----

To: Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]>
From: Neil Bartlett <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
Date: 02/22/2011 10:46AM
Cc: Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Replacement for PackageAdmin.getBundles

BJ, could you confirm that the old API will still be available in
all frameworks... otherwise this would be a serious breaking
change for existing clients.

Sent from my BlackBerry

On 22 Feb 2011, at 16:09, BJ Hargrave <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

There is no replacement for that method. You can just grovel over
the bundles to find this information. Seems like a job for a
utility class...

That method was not a good fit for packageadmin anyway since it
nothing to do with the wiring state of the bundles.
-- *BJ Hargrave*
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the _OSGi Alliance_ <http://www.osgi.org/>_
[email protected]_ <mailto:[email protected]>

office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788







From: Gunnar Wagenknecht <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Date: 2011/02/22 07:08
Subject: [equinox-dev] Replacement for PackageAdmin.getBundles
Sent by: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Hi,

What's the recommended replacement for
org.osgi.service.packageadmin.PackageAdmin.getBundles(String,
String)? I
was looking for a similar method in the new org.osgi.framework.wiring
package. But it appears that there is none. I haven't checked the
changes for M6, though.

-Gunnar



-- Gunnar Wagenknecht
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://wagenknecht.org/

_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev



_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

Reply via email to