I'm not sure I understand how this would work.  Would you designate
particular PIDs as being global vs. component-specific configurations?
Either way the Equinox Configuration Admin implementation would need to be
enhanced to allow a different persistence mechanism/policy to be plugged
in.  Instead of forking or writing your own implementation I suggest you
open a bug report so we can discuss an enhancement and possible ways of
implementing it.

Tom




|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |"Kirchev, Lazar" <l.kirc...@sap.com>                                         
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org>                   
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |05/25/2011 06:44 AM                                                          
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Re: [equinox-dev] ConfigAdmin getConfiguration from external storage         
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





Hello,

What we actually need is to be able to use a custom configuration storage
along with the ConfigAdmin's internal storage, without moving
configurations from the custom storage to the internal storage. The goal is
to use the ConfigAdmin's internal storage for global configurations, while
the custom storage for more component-specific configurations. Both have
nothing in common and should not be mixed up. We want to use the Equinox
implementation of ConfigAdmin, without forking the code or reimplementing
it. Could you propose a way to achieve this?

Regards,
Lazar

-----Original Message-----
From: equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [
mailto:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Neil Bartlett
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 3:29 PM
To: Equinox development mailing list
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] ConfigAdmin getConfiguration from external
storage

Hi Philip,

The normal way to hook config admin into an external data storage is
to write a management agent that *calls* getConfiguration() and
supplies the data via an update to the Configuration object. That way
your agent can work with any config admin implementation.

Typically config admin implementations use their own internal storage
area for persistence. If you want to customise that internal storage
then you may need to write your own implementation (though I think at
least the Felix implementation has an extension mechanism so you don't
have to write the whole thing).

Regards,
Neil

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Philip Yankov <duxmas...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to get a notification when
> ConfigurationAdmin.getConfiguration( with any pid ) is called and return
a
> configuration from an external storage then? Are you aware of existing
> mechanism to achieve this? Alternatively, we thought of pluging a hook
> inside getConfiguration() method, or directly extending
> ConfigurationAdminImpl and registering it instead of the current service
> (ConfigurationAdminImpl should be made public though). How do you think,
> what would be the preferred approach?
>
> Best regards,
>   Philip Yankov
> _______________________________________________
> equinox-dev mailing list
> equinox-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

<<inline: graycol.gif>>

<<inline: ecblank.gif>>

_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

Reply via email to