> > Fragment-Host: system.bundle; extension:=extclasspath > > Would this extension:=extclasspath cause problems to other > OSGi-Implementations like e.g. felix?
A compliant framework should reject this manifest since the standard directive does not specify a valid value. If you are thinking of having a non-standard, Equinox-specific value for a standard directive, why not just add an Equinox-specific manifest header or Equinox-specific directive? Fragment-Host: system.bundle; x-appclasspath:=ext This does not sound like it would work in general anyway. What happens when the framework is launched from code whose classpath does not include ext? I assume the option here is either use the bootclasscloader for the parent of the classloader used to load the framework or use the current classloader for the parent of the classloader used to load the framework. -- BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance hargr...@us.ibm.com office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1 386 848 3788
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
