I certainly wouldn't be opposed to making p2 its own project, but how much extra overhead in involved (*managerial* -- release, docware, etc... and * technical* -- builds, platform contribution, etc..)? Also, there are a few components (simple configurator for example), which are kinda p2 and kinda platform and sorta equinox. I guess Pascal and Tom would have a good idea of where to place these things (they're in p2 right now).
cheers, ian On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <[email protected]>wrote: > Am 06.12.2012 23:46, schrieb Pascal Rapicault: > > Another solution is to make p2 a project in of itself. >> > > That's what I was thinking. > > -Gunnar > > > > -- > Gunnar Wagenknecht > [email protected] > http://wagenknecht.org/ > > > ______________________________**_________________ > equinox-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev> > -- R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
