As I'm not too familiar with the definitions of all the runtime qualifiers,
I'm wondering if we need more than just:

Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: JavaSE-1.6

- Ray


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Raymond Auge <[email protected]>wrote:

> I agree on all points.
>
> For now I'm going to assume 3.0 & Java 6 and once I get that, I'll then
> proceed to verifying 3.1 & Java 7.
>
> - Ray
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Watson <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I think we should target Java 6 if it makes life more simple.  Our jetty
>> backed solution on Jetty 8 already requires Java 6 and I have been told
>> that Servlet 3.0 requires Java 6 as a minimum.  Moving forward we need to
>> figure out if we can pull off a base http.servlet bundle that supports 3.1
>> and 3.0 servlet.  I think Servlet 3.1 may require Java 7, but in the past
>> we have been able to have http.servlet support much older Java versions.
>>
>> BTW, I would like us to consider having the http.servlet bundle be as
>> forwards compatible as possible.  I think this is important for cases where
>> a war is delivered with http.servlet bundle embedded.  Otherwise the bridge
>> style WAR will become incompatible on later servers that implement the very
>> latest servlet spec.
>>
>> Currently we attempt to do this by using proxies for provider types like
>> the ServletContext which then delegate to the hosting container's provider
>> type implementations.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Inactive hide details for Raymond Auge ---03/23/2014 10:05:16
>> PM---With respect to updating org.eclipse.equinox.http.servlet to]Raymond
>> Auge ---03/23/2014 10:05:16 PM---With respect to updating
>> org.eclipse.equinox.http.servlet to RFC 189. Are we increasing:
>>
>>
>> From: Raymond Auge <[email protected]>
>> To: Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]>,
>> Date: 03/23/2014 10:05 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] equinox http service
>> Sent by: [email protected]
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> With respect to updating org.eclipse.equinox.http.servlet to RFC 189.
>>
>> Are we increasing:
>> * org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.compliance
>> * org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source
>> * Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment
>> * org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.ui.launcher.StandardVMType
>>
>> Basically, what's the baseline Java version we're limited to increasing
>> this too.
>>
>> - Ray
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Raymond Auge 
>> <*[email protected]*<[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>    Hello Thomas, et al.
>>
>>    I managed to use the org.eclipse.equinox.http.servlet without
>>    modification as the Http Service in Liferay without using the equinox
>>    bridge or doing any nasty hackery. It was actually trivially simple.
>>
>>    This is a good stepping stone to start hacking in the new
>>    http-service spec on top of this knowing that we're starting from an
>>    working common denominator.
>>
>>    Probably tomorrow I'll create a github fork with a branch for this
>>    work.
>>
>>    Sincerely,
>>    - Ray
>>
>>
>>    On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Raymond Auge <
>>    *[email protected]* <[email protected]>> wrote:
>>       Nvm... Old checkout.
>>
>>       On Mar 21, 2014 5:26 PM, "Raymond Auge" 
>> <*[email protected]*<[email protected]>>
>>       wrote:
>>       Hey all,
>>
>>          I'd like to confirm my understanding that
>>          rt.equinox.bundles/org.eclipse.equinox.http is indeed the (and only)
>>          http-service implementation in equinox.
>>
>>          Thx
>>
>>          --
>>          *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>>           (@rotty3000)
>>          Senior Software Architect
>>          *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com/> (@Liferay)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    --
>>    *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>>     (@rotty3000)
>>    Senior Software Architect
>>    *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com/> (@Liferay)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>>  (@rotty3000)
>> Senior Software Architect
>> *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com/> (@Liferay)
>> _______________________________________________
>> equinox-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> equinox-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect
> *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)
>
>


-- 
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect
*Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)

<<inline: graycol.gif>>

_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

Reply via email to