Why does Felix CM call doPrivileged with an ACC from the object it is about to call? That is pointless since that object will soon be on the call stack and thus its permissions will be tested.
Perhaps the problem is solved by using the one arg version of doPrivileged:
AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedExceptionAction() {
public Object run() throws ConfigurationException {
service.updated( properties );
return null;
}
});
--
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM // office: +1 386 848 1781
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance // mobile: +1 386 848 3788
[email protected]
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM // office: +1 386 848 1781
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance // mobile: +1 386 848 3788
[email protected]
----- Original message -----
From: Derek Baum <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] security exceptions using Felix config admin with Equinox
Date: Wed, May 18, 2016 3:16 PM
Hi,I’ve also posted this to the Felix dev list, as the problem occurs when using Felix config admin with Equinox runtime.I’m using org.eclipse.osgi_3.10.101.v20150820-1432.jarThanks,—DerekOn 18 May 2016, at 18:58, Derek Baum <[email protected]> wrote:I’m running with a SecurityManager installed and a trivial security.policy that grants AllPermission.This works fine when running using the Felix runtime; however when I switch to Equinox I get security exceptions.I’m not yet sure whether the problem lies with Felix config admin (1.8.8), Equinox runtime or elsewhere.I’ve diagnosed the cause of the failure as follows:Felix config admin ManagedServiceTracker, uses doPrivileged() to invoke the service.updated() method, with a new AccessControlContext:AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedExceptionAction() {public Object run() throws ConfigurationException {service.updated( properties );return null;}}, getAccessControlContext( service ) );AccessControlContext getAccessControlContext( final Object ref ) {return new AccessControlContext( new ProtectionDomain[]{ ref.getClass().getProtectionDomain() } );}Felix and Equinox return different ProtectionDomain implementations:org.apache.felix.framework.BundleProtectionDomainorg.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.ModuleClassLoader$GenerationProtectionDomainBoth implementations extend ProtectionDomain, but the Felix implementation uses the 4-arg constructor:The permissions granted to this domain are dynamic; they include
both the static permissions passed to this constructor, and any
permissions granted to this domain by the current Policy at thetime a permission is checked.while the Equinox implementation uses the 2-arg constructor.The only permissions granted to this domainare the ones specified; the current Policy will not be consultedSo the problem arises because Felix config admin is using doPrivileged() with a new AccessControlContext(), constructed using the target classes ProtectionDomain, and the ProtectionDomain returned when running on Equinox, does not consult the current policy, so my security policy containing grant AllPermission is ignored.I’ve taken a quick look at the Equinox config admin implementation, and it doesn’t use doPrivileged() or a new AccessControlContext(),so the issue does not arise.Any opinions on whether this issue lies in Felix config admin, Equinox framework, or elsewhere?Thanks,—Derek_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
