Over the years Equinox has become a stable project.  The last major code 
effort was in the Luna release when the Equinox framework was refactored 
to use the OSGi generic capability and requirements model along with the 
OSGi Resolver service.  Over the past few years the list of active 
committers has dropped to just a handful.  We did add two additional 
committers this past year, but even the voting turnout from existing 
committers was pretty low.
The Eclipse top-level project itself has also suffered from a drop in 
active committers.  In an effort to consolidate the committer base and get 
more active committers across the eclipse project the Eclipse PMC has 
continued to merge their own committer groups so that they can share the 
burden of maintaining the rather large code base among the set of active 
committers included in the top-level Eclipse project.
Many years ago the Equinox project was spun out of the Eclipse top-level 
project to its own project under the top-level RT project.  The Eclipse 
project continued to heavily depend on Equinox for its runtime and the two 
projects are still very closely tied together with respect to planning and 
release engineering for the overall releases produced each year.  It has 
become apparent to me that separating Equinox out from under the top-level 
Eclipse project is not serving in the continued best interests of Equinox 
nor the Eclipse project as a whole.  As Equinox committers, we deal more 
closely with the Eclipse PMC in planning our release than we do the RT 
PMC.  I think it is more representative of the work done in Equinox to be 
placed back under the Eclipse project PMC.  I propose we do a move review 
to move the Equinox project back under the Eclipse top-level project.
I do not anticipate this will change much in the way of how we develop and 
release Equinox today since much of that is already influenced by the 
Eclipse Project release engineering team.  I also do not think this will 
inhibit our ability to change how Equinox is developed, if we so choose. 
For example:
- having more frequent releases to maven central
- moving to bndtools for development
- etc.
We should be able to drive changes into Equinox with the same flexibility 
as we do under the RT top-level project.  But instead of being under the 
leadership of the disparate RT PMC (which is largely be design) we will be 
back under the leadership of the Eclipse PMC which I believe is more 
cohesive to the day to day activities in Equinox than the overall RT PMC. 
Please let me know if you have any concerns or questions about moving 
Equinox back to the top-level Eclipse project.  If nobody objects then I 
will start to formalize a plan to do the move.


equinox-dev mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit

Reply via email to