Challenge I have with the Zig-Zag indicator is you can not trust the final leg 
until it is completely formed and that requires future data to establish that 
leg,...
All the past legs were also formed based on information needed for that leg 
which required future data,...
Thus the legs look really good once they are formed and look like they were 
formed exactly as they appear,... not true,..
In short, you can never rely on the Zig-Zag indicator to give you an accurate 
final position on the most current bar.

As far as using the Zig-Zag indicator for waves and wave count, I would say it 
is useful as it does give you a consistent technical 
set of waves which is better then trying to draw them in yourself which is then 
more based on judgement,...
But again, the final leg is still non-predective until it is finally formed 
with future data.

I do not use Elliot Wave for trading as I see too much of the move lost in the 
forming of the wave,...
Elliot Wave count is also using Fibanacci Series to count the waves in wave 
count series, so it can be an appropriate series to use.

I use Pitchforks and find them to have a greater then 50% predictive value,...
For me, above 80% when I use them on large Indexes,...
I took the time to understand how they are formed and as I learned how they are 
formed and why they work, it also boosted my confidence in their use,...
As they are Market Geometry I do not trade on them alone, but as confirmation 
along with other trading signal indicators.




----- Original Message ----- 
  From: sourav 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 6:57 AM
  Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: Metastock zig zag indicator


    
  Thank you for your reply.Very astute and observant of you. I never thought 
about it like that. But the million dollar question is---Does it work?
  I'd like your opinion.

  Regards,

  Dr.Chatterjee

  --- In [email protected], "Bill Hebert" <billhebert@...> wrote:
  >
  > He is simply just using the Fibanocci series numbers,... 
2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89 etc... and also using 1 and not 2 as the first number 
for the Zig-Zag
  > 
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: sourav 
  > To: [email protected] 
  > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 7:20 AM
  > Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: Metastock zig zag indicator
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > Dear Sir,
  > 
  > Thank you for replying. Your statement makes sense if the parameters you 
suggest is set at 8%,5%,3%,1% corresponding to intermediate, minor, minute and 
minuette degree of waves. Thank you once again. But I do not trade intraday and 
am mostly interested in waves of Intermediate (which you have 
given),primary,cycle,super cycle 
  > degrees. Do you have parameters for these?
  > 
  > Also may I ask the source for these Zig zag indicator parameters? Is it a 
one different from the one in the Alpha Omega Elliott manual? You see I wish to 
confirm the AOZZ indicator readings with the Zig Zag indicator.Thus my interest 
in an independent source of parameters.
  > 
  > Regards,
  > 
  > Dr.Chatterjee
  > --- In [email protected], parama guru <prmguru@> wrote:
  > >
  > > 
  > > 
  > >  SET parameters 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, 1 
  > > 
  > > Â 
  > > your,
  > > M.PARAMAGURUPARAN
  > > 
  > > 
  > > ________________________________
  > > From: sourav <sournila@>
  > > To: [email protected] 
  > > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 11:40 AM
  > > Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Metastock zig zag indicator
  > > 
  > > Â 
  > > 
  > > Could someone please tell me the parameters (in percentage) for the 
Metastock Zig Zag indicator for identifying Elliott Waves of various (eg 
Primary, Intermediate, Minor) degrees?
  > > 
  > > Mr. Robert Tasse in his Metastock Add on Alpha Omega Elliott Waves gives 
the parameters for a similar indicator AOZZ as 34%,,21%,13% 8%,5%,3% and 1% I 
would like to confirm this indicator with the Zig Zag indicator.
  > > 
  > > Regards,
  > > 
  > > Dr.Chatterjee
  > >
  >



  

Reply via email to