----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- Friends. Here is what I found while investigating the bolt torque issue. When I removed the wings on 3330H I found the wing bolts not very strong tightened. These wings were at least ten years that way on my plane and after removing , I could not find any wear on bolts or fittings. I think the bolts act pins, designed to withstand shearing action. They fit snug and the nuts are there to keep them in place. The surface of the fittings (plates) seems not big enough to take up the force of the moving wing, even when clamped together with some 1000lb. If the bolts are clamped that strong, they will stretch and get slightly thinner. Now you'll have what we are trying to avoid - room for play. Now the attachments and bolts have a chance to wear. What's more is that the preloaded bolt might break away when shearing forces are applied, because it is taking already some 1000lb as stretching force inside. Of course the bolts should be tight enough to avoid movement of themselves.That could lead to wear as well. The proper procedure for tightening the bolts is described in the latest SERVICE BULLETIN NO. 31 from Univair. http://www.univair.com/bulletin_add/sb31/sb31.pdf For those who don't have Adobe Reader, here an excerpt. "Reinstall outer wing panels, if removed per Method 3, in reverse sequence of removal, making sure that mounting bolts are properly fitted and safetied. NOTE: The recommended method for tightening the nuts on the wing attach bolts is to draw nuts down tight and continue tightening as required to line up the nearest slot and cotterpin hole provided you do not exceed 100 ft-lb dry torque on the front bolts and 10 ft-lbs dry torque on the rear bolts. Safety wing attach bolts with NEW cotter pins: AN380-4-4 (MS24665-353) for front and AN380-2-2 (MS24665-132) for rear fittings. DO NOT reuse old cotter pins." There are a lot of joints in an airplane which are not meant to be clamped together, usually in the controls and on landing gear etc. The use of clevis bolts is a sure sign that the bolt in the joint acts as an axle in way. I see the wing bolts as some form filling pins, which allow the parts being stuck together with no play in the joints. This is my opinion on that matter. Of course anybody might have his own. I am in no way authorized to tell anyone what to do. I also do not want to proof anybody wrong or right. I just gathered information and added my thoughts. Have a good evening my fellow Coupers.
Hartmut N3330H San Francisco
============================================================================== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers/ |
- [COUPERS-FLYIN] Wing Bolt Torque David Perozek
- RE: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Wing Bolt Torque Patrick Thompson
- Re: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Wing Bolt Torque NY86Airfield
- Fw: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Wing Bolt Torque Walker Lee
- Re: Fw: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Wing Bolt Torque Cessna126
- [COUPERS-FLYIN] Wing Bolt Torque WDELROSSI
- Re: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Wing Bolt Torque Hartmut Beil
