----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
This message was automatically forwarded
on behalf of Bill Bayne. Please address any responses to the mail list or
directly to Bill at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: William R. Bayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 6:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stuck Message(s?)
On Jan 28, 2006, at 16:53, Ed Burkhead wrote:
/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
Bill,/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
I didn’t receive the 2/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
nd/x-tad-smaller>/color>/fontfamily>
and 3/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
rd/x-tad-smaller>/color>/fontfamily>
messages at all. You’d better resend them.
/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
I don't think you got the 1st either. It was a second reply on the same topic as one earlier.
I just resent all three individually
/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
For relay, the message should contain “rlyflyin” or “rlytech” as appropriate./x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
They all did, although I have, to date, always used upper case. Now, per your example, I am using all lower case.
/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
What to you mean by “/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>I have used the "forward" replication to reveal my original time of sending and removed the "RELAYTECH" (which was in each) for manual relay./bigger>/bigger>/fontfamily>” Perhaps the incorrect term “relaytech” is why some messages are not automatically relaying.
/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
"RELAYTECH" was an inadvertent mistake in my "Stuck Message(s)? email. The term deleted from all three was "RLYTECH".
When I tell my email program to "Forward", the copy of a given message then shows the time of my original transmission. When trying ;-) to timely respond to list queries, and knowing there may be half a day's delay when things don't go right, my messages can look out of date, stale and redundant if there is no indication as to a time before which the message had to have been authored. It's VERY frustrating to be "first up" with an in-depth response and watch for sixteen hours as others chime in identical information that the list will "time stamp" as more timely, but I know of nothing more we can do to get around the problem.
But that doesn’t explain why I didn’t receive your two messages at all./x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
Or three. That remains a mystery. A ding from my email program confirms all three of my messages just relayed through this time.
Regards,
WRB
--
/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
Happy to help./x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
Ed/x-tad-bigger>/color>/fontfamily>
============================================================================== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers/
