I agree that the club is great for most people. And some would like 
more. I told AJ that there is always room for improvements. They 
don't have to be realy large steps. May be just small ones to start 
with. Like trying to get more people in and keeping them in. And then 
building on that. If we never improved on anything we would still be 
living in caves.  Mark 




--- In [email protected], "AJ DeMarzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Andy;
> 
> I appreciate your thoughts and enthusiasm, it's just what a good 
organization needs.  Ten people like you could rule the world!  (If 
you ever get that job would you see what you can do about fuel 
prices?)  However from some of your sentences, I do feel that you may 
be misinterpreting my comments along with the feelings of a bunch of 
folks that have the thoughtfulness of expressing themselves.  First, 
I realize that my choice to no longer associate myself with the EOC 
will not bring me any benefits.  I don't expect any, never will and 
am not at all slighted by it and hope that I am not giving the 
impression that I am expecting something for nothing.  My choice was 
for specific reasons, others have theirs and I hope that's finally 
cleared up.  What you say is so true and you only get out of an org 
what you put in, but could it be that many who are not members feel 
that what is initially offered is just not enough?    That would also 
be fine as you can't please everyone all of the time.  (Also realize 
that some can only "participate" by their support of membership!)  My 
contention is simply that when something is broken I like to ask what 
can be done to fix it.  When it doesn't get fixed, for whatever 
reason, I see a missed opportunity for things to be better.  Can I 
fix it?  I don't know but if I tried it would only be to everyone's.  
In the case of the current type club I've noticed something broken 
for a long time.  Others feel everything is fine and that's perfectly 
okay.  I guess I just enjoy looking at things and thinking of how 
much better they can be and in the case of a business or a beneficial 
club that's something necessary for survival.  That action is not a 
criticism of what's been accomplished unless the controlling 
management of the org interpret it in that way which is foolish and 
no benefit to anyone, supporter or not.  I'm sure you would agree 
that it's difficult for one to always do everything correctly alone 
and without help.  It would beg the question why read instructional 
books, visit health professionals, contact the police or fire 
department, accountant, city manager, etc.  Incidentally, all the 
aforementioned folks stay on their game by participating in some type 
of recurrent training.  Getting new ideas and help.
> 
> So before anyone gets the impression that this is a discussion of 
criticism and an all around bashing of the current type club, you may 
want to go back, reread and expand your scope, because it's not.  
It's a healthy exchange of what I see that could be offered and 
available to YOU, the Ercoupe community.   
> 
> Whatever the outcome of this thread, my intentions are that it will 
be to the benefit of all!
> 
> Happy New Year!
> 
> Al DeMarzo
> Visit the Ercoupe Swap Page - Free and Easy
> http://www.ercoupeowners.com/swap/swapbook.htm
> 
> 
>     
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Andy Anderson 
>   To: 'AJ DeMarzo' 
>   Cc: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:35 AM
>   Subject: [ercoupe-flyin] RE: Type Club
> 
> 
> 
>   AJ DeMarzo and all other non EOC members,
> 
> 
> 
>   Mr. Tommy Terry infers a most valid point in his post. That 
being, you only get out of an organization what you put into it. 
Therefore if you are not an EOC member; if you do not receive the 
newsletter; and if you do not attend the annual EOC conventions; It 
appears to me that you are receiving just what you are should receive 
from EOC; Nothing in - nothing out.
> 
> 
> 
>   In my opinion, the Ercoupe community will never be of a size to 
support a fancy newsletter or the high dollar conventions. 
Personally, I prefer the grass roots type conventions that we have. I 
have attended most of the conventions over the past ten years. All 
have been enjoyable. The Minden convention was poorly organized but 
still enjoyable. The 2007 convention at Wayne Nebraska was well 
organized and very enjoyable. 
> 
> 
> 
>   If you want to host a convention, then have at it and make it as 
fancy as you want. If you want to organize a simple Saturday lunch 
fly-out, then have at it. Just get involved instead of sitting on 
your duff on the sideline and throwing rocks at an organization you 
are not a member of. Also; if you want to organize your own type 
club, then have at it. Personally I think my efforts will be more 
effective if I work from inside EOC as a member. I am basically happy 
with EOC. I would like to see the newsletter in a different format 
instead of PDF and have made that recommendation. However; if the 
majority of members prefer PDF, then that is how it should be.
> 
> 
> 
>   The fantastic web site that is mentioned in Dan Hall's post: 
http://socal_wvaf.rvproject.com/  is the work of one individual by 
the name of Dan Check way, and is not the work of a type club. You 
could be that one individual who posts pictures of your Ercoupe 
projects. Or you could write an article for the newsletter. Or you 
could organize a fly-in... Or you can sit on your butt as a non-
member and complain that no one is doing anything for YOU - your 
choice. 
> 
> 
> 
>   Regards,
> 
>   Andy Anderson - EOC Member & Arkansas Wing Leader
> 
>   415-D N93609 
> 
> 
> 
>   PS: Speaking of Dan Check way, I recommend his weather site:  
www.Weathermeister.com  I use it before every cross country flight.
> 
> 
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
> 
>   From: [email protected] [mailto:ercoupe-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AJ DeMarzo
>   Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 11:29 PM
>   To: [email protected]
>   Subject: Re: [ercoupe-flyin] Type Club
> 
> 
> 
>   Someone asked, I forgot who but when I reply to a post, I 
hit "Reply All" and then in the address columns I delete the 
individuals so they don't get doubles.
> 
> 
> 
>   Good site!  Members fired up and willing to share!  That's what 
we need.  As far as what can be done, recognize the problem and 
suggest solutions.  Remember I'm not a member of EOC.
> 
> 
> 
>   Al DeMarzo
>   Visit the Ercoupe Swap Page - Free and Easy
>   http://www.ercoupeowners.com/swap/swapbook.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
>   From: Dan Hall 
> 
>   To: [email protected] ; Tommy Terry ; Dan Hall 
> 
>   Cc: 'AJ DeMarzo' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED] 
> 
>   Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 10:01 PM
> 
>   Subject: Re: [ercoupe-flyin] Type Club
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   BTW - Here's an excellent example of an RV builders web site, as 
an example of what could be done for Ercoupe maintenance related 
information;  http://socal_wvaf.rvproject.com/   There are MANY 
photos and related text to help describe various building tasks. 
> 
> 
> 
>   I'm just putting this out there as an example of what can be 
done...
> 
>   Dan Hall
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
>   From: Dan Hall 
> 
>   To: [email protected] ; Tommy Terry 
> 
>   Cc: 'AJ DeMarzo' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED] 
> 
>   Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 7:56 PM
> 
>   Subject: Re: [ercoupe-flyin] Type Club
> 
> 
> 
>   Tommy,
> 
>   I absolutely agree with your observations.
> 
> 
> 
>   Mark, AJ, & Wayne, Ed, & all;
> 
>   That sounds like an excellent idea.  If practical, building on or 
supplementing what already exists seems a far better option than 
fragmenting an already small and shrinking (!) group.
> 
> 
> 
>   I've put a lot of energy into Region 7 for the past 4 years 
trying to rally interest and participation, and the returns seem 
marginal at best (the help of one member has provided us with a web 
site for the region @ http://www.calcoupers.org/  ).    
> 
> 
> 
>   Someone at the national level tasked with Government & regulatory 
affairs, to work with the FAA, EAA, and possibly the AOPA would seem 
to make the most sense.  
> 
> 
> 
>   Who has the technical knowledge, is willing to do the work 
required, and perhaps has some governmental contacts already....?
> 
> 
> 
>   IMHO -  We also very much need to continue Ed Burkhead's work by 
carefully documenting Coupe specific technical information and 
posting on the web for reference by all.  It seems to me that rather 
basic things like detailed annual inspection information written to 
the level of a typical owner WITH PHOTOS would be a good start.  
Details regarding each of the AD's & STC's (again, with photos!) 
would be great, as would an index of maintenance & repair tasks such 
as correct re-rigging and other typical Ercoupe specific issues (all 
with PHOTOS).  General info on things like the engine and accessories 
would be nice too.   
> 
> 
> 
>   The Ercoupe Tech Gurus out there may not realize how many & 
import the tricks and "simple things" they know that would drive 
owners and even A&P's crazy, and how valuable their knowledge and 
insights are to the rest of us.
> 
> 
> 
>   Happy New Year and Best Regards,
> 
>   Dan Hall
> 
>   N3968H
> 
>   CNO
> 
>   Region 7 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
>   From: Tommy Terry 
> 
>   To: [email protected] 
> 
>   Cc: 'AJ DeMarzo' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
>   Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 7:47 PM
> 
>   Subject: [ercoupe-flyin] Type Club
> 
>   After reading the parts of this discussion that were on-list, I 
must agree that our type club may not be all that we might want it to 
be.
> 
>    Let's look at some of what I know our club does do: there is a 
monthly newsletter and an annual convention that come to light 
immediately.  The not so obvious things might include a dedication to 
keeping our type in existence by providing an irreplaceable source of 
knowledge specific to our birds and the "momentum" that was mentioned 
in an earlier post.  In addition to these tangible accomplishments; 
there is the scholarship dedicated to the memory of one of, if not 
the, greatest aeronautical engineers this country has known.
> 
>    Looking a little more deeply into these things:
> 
>   The scholarship is totally funded by donations made by our 
members at the annual convention.  It may not be a Billion Dollar 
deal, but it is appreciated by the folks who receive it and it keeps 
the legacy of Mr. Fred Weick alive.
> 
>   The "momentum" of the type club does exist.  Our leadership may 
not be setting the world on fire but they are keeping an eye on lots 
of things.  A couple of years ago when the infamous SB32 came along, 
our leaders kept us informed of what was being found as long as we 
kept them informed.
> 
>   In the EOC we have a pool of knowledge that cannot be replaced; a 
lot of those folks also share that knowledge on these forums but the 
type club gives them a "formal" setting to work from when needed.
> 
>   Our newsletter and convention seem to come under fire fairly 
regularly and I must admit that there is room for improvement in each 
category.  The 2008 convention promises to be great.  Syd is working 
very hard to insure that a good time, as well as an educational time 
is had by all.  2009 should also be good if the folks at the 
convention center in Vicksburg are to be believed; and I think they 
are.
> 
>   The newsletter is probably the most visible part of our club and, 
yes, it can be a bit lame at times.  Publishing a newsletter is tough 
work, especially when you have to depend on members of a club spread 
around the world to give you the information to publish.  Even if 
every member sent something once per year it would still be hard to 
have new and interesting material.  How much new can be written about 
an airframe design that is 60 years old when you've been writing 
every month for 30 years?
> 
>    Yes, there are organizations that have a really slick newsletter 
and a 'barn burner' of an annual convention, but those organizations 
have something ours doesn't: A paid staff.  Our dues of $20 per year 
will not provide for the slick newsletters written by paid staff or 
filled with bought articles.  The modest registration fees for the 
annual convention will not support the fancy conventions that some 
organizations have.
> 
>    I do not want to start a big ruckus and will not participate in 
anything less than civil debate.  However; the EOC is not an entity 
of itself, WE are the EOC and if we want the club to be different, we 
need to re-direct it.  Let's not throw the current or past leadership 
to the wolves. Rather, we should appreciate what they have done to 
keep the club intact and ready for the next 30 years.
> 
>    One last thought:  Mr. C.W. Tackett, Scout Master of troop 7 had 
a saying, "You only get as much out of scouting as you put into it."  
If all we put into the Ercoupe Owner's Club is $20 per year, that's 
all we can expect out of it.  If we want more; we must do more: write 
an article, send some photos, offer to hold the convention......
> 
>    Tommy
> 
>   N93929
>


Reply via email to