Al wrote:
> So Brent, lemme get this straight. Bertorelli won't print > Dan's letter in his rag but puts it up, mockingly, on his > BLOG? Am I correct with that assumption? I don't know > the guy (but do know not to care anything about his low > rate publications) but can't think he's that fargin' stupid! > If so, sounds like Paul is asking for a bloodied nose! Al, Chill, Al, chill! Apparently it was Paul Berge who wrote the article for Aviation Consumer with which we took exception. Dan sent the letter to AC who, it seems, forwarded it on to the writer. It was the writer, Paul Berge, who posted the letter in its entirety on his own website. He made it a bit cutsey, but he printed the entire rebuttal. That's as it should be. He writes something we don't like, we rebut it factually, he prints that even including all of our comments that were non-complimentary toward the writer. I have no complaints about the writer's handling of Dan's rebuttal (which included a bit of text I had suggested). Let's see if Aviation Consumer prints the rebuttal. Ed Burkhead http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/index.htm East Peoria, Illinois ed -at- edburk???head.??com (remove the ? marks and change -at- to @)
