Bill wrote: > I noted in the article that Swift fuel weighs 6.5 lbs./gallon. > > That would work out to twelve pounds useful load lost with a full > 24-gallon fuel load of it in an Ercoupe ;<).
True, but the Swift fuel is supposed to have higher energy density allowing either a. longer range or, b. the same range with a slightly lower gallon-count of fuel in the tanks (with, presumably, about the same weight as with gasoline). If the stuff works and can pass the hurdles, it might help protect us from future eco-targeting. I'm watching to see how it shakes out. Ed
