----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----


At 10:55 AM 7/28/2003 -0400, John Bennett wrote:
>  First: My coupe also tends to turn to the right.

Mebbe wait till the next election, see if it comes to its senses :-)

>The ball is almost always right of center.

Um...Orville? I think we have a problem. If the ball is to the RIGHT, 
you're yawing
to the LEFT.  Maybe turning. Maybe not. You know. 'Step on the ball.'
'Keep the
right rudder.' All them CFI-isms.

>   I do have rudder peddles and have found if I center the ball with the 
> rudders, it has a detrimental effect on climb. I normally climb at about

> 500fpm. Correcting yaw drops it down to about 400fpm.

Now, I'm a bit more confused. We normally talk about 'rig' with regard to 
straight and
level flight, and behavior in the stall. If you're climbing, it's fairly 
normal to have a bit of
a left yaw. The Ercoupe's engine is canted rather severely to the right to

try and make
pedals redundant, and the H-tail keeps the propwash from bearing on the 
rudders so
much as a normal plane. BUT all that is tuned for the standard prop on a 
C75. If you're
running a C85, C90, or O-200, you're going to yaw a bit in full-power
climbs.

Whether correcting that yaw vs. letting it happen should cost drag, I'm
not 
sure...
...maybe the inefficiency of yawed flight is less expensive in terms of
energy
than offset rudders?

How does the plane do in normal cruise? How about in the mush/stall?

>  I'm not quite sure why that is but couldn't the correction be made in 
> the rudder trim rather than trying to add aileron trim?

See all of the forgoing...is some trim really necessary? Or is this a 
high-power/low-airspeed
condition only?

>     The other item I wanted to mention was that the rough running at 
> altitude that I was experiencing two weeks ago was indeed carb ice. I 
> tested theory out Friday morning. At altitude I pulled the carb heat on 
> and the rpm dropped about 200rpm then crept back up as the ice melted. 
> Thanks for all the responses.

Just remember: Continental was a division of Kelvinator :-)

>     When I mentioned trying to lean out the mixture to my AI he said
that 
> on my carb there is only two settings, rich and lean.  Push the knob all

> the way in for rich and pull all the way out for lean.  He said that I 
> should run in the lean position above 5000'.
>     Any comments on that?

I assume we're talking Stromberg here. While it is true that the Stromberg

is pretty
much self-regulating (NOT full rich if it's working right, but 
*self-regulating* below
5000, this is a Stromberg auto- and plane-carb engineering hallmark) and
that
'full lean' won't kill the engine, there are most certainly settings
between full-rich and full lean on the mixture control. And you shouldn't 
blindly
yank it all the way out, but rather lean for best RPM coupled with smooth
running. And do so by making small changes and waiting for the effect. 
Generally
engines respond best to gentle attentions.

Greg 


==========================================================================
====
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/


<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to